• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Councils get power to ‘spy’ on your e-mail and net use

There's nothing new that I can see?

This information is already held by the ISP and as the paragraph states on the article:

"The information will include the date and times of the log-in and log-off from the internet – the “who, when, and where” of communication – but not the contents of calls, messages or lists of websites which had been accessed."

It looks like scaremongering and I for one don't have an issue with it ;)
 
UnMarked said:
There's nothing new that I can see?

This information is already held by the ISP and as the paragraph states on the article:

"The information will include the date and times of the log-in and log-off from the internet – the “who, when, and where” of communication – but not the contents of calls, messages or lists of websites which had been accessed."

It looks like scaremongering and I for one don't have an issue with it ;)
Click to expand...

Don't believe that they will not take contents into consideration.:D
 
no but an anonymous letter to a cheating partner is a good source of blackmail.
 
Comment from a reader::D :D

£46 million to store the penis-extension spam emails I get and those that tell me to check my non-existent bank account (with my username and password.) Plus all those helpful emails I get to assist with an inheritance (from Nigeria), for twelve months?

Wow, what wonderful value for money!
 
recycled said:
no but an anonymous letter to a cheating partner is a good source of blackmail.
Click to expand...
I don't think I've got an annonomous cheating partner. Should I get one.?
 
UnMarked said:
I'm sure they'd be interested to see what i'm buying from Sainsbury's :D :D
Click to expand...

Imagine you are in your bedroom, you are giving your rights away, any officer can walk into your bedroom anytime and check on you whether you
are having sex or not and what time you did it. If this is not invasion of privacy, what do you call it.

I left my french door opened last night to let in the fresh air, inadvertently my neighbour's cat walked in. That startled me let alone an officer.

Remember last night watched the Essex Police Interceptors after the repeat of Fifth Gear on Fiver channel, the burly police just barged in the house his mum screaming. Wait a minute, does not the police requires a warrant before they can enter a house?:eek:
 
Dragon said:
Imagine you are in your bedroom, you are giving your rights away, any officer can walk into your bedroom anytime and check on you whether you
Click to expand...

Any chance of arranging for it to be Portzy's 'stopper', still in uniform...;)
 
UnMarked said:
Gosh, don't tell Pammy!! :eek:



Chocolates and flowers - I've some making up to do it seems :D :D
Click to expand...

Ahhh.

I was in Sainsburys the other day with two teenage daughters! Big mistake. Cost a fortune in toiletries and make up stuff:crazy: Anyway, one of the girls picks up an item from the 'family planning' section. I was quite shocked. It was a vibrating ring! Even more shocking was the daughter concerned knew what it was!
 
Dragon said:
Imagine you are in your bedroom, you are giving your rights away, any officer can walk into your bedroom anytime and check on you whether you
are having sex or not and what time you did it. If this is not invasion of privacy, what do you call it.

I left my french door opened last night to let in the fresh air, inadvertently my neighbour's cat walked in. That startled me let alone an officer.

Remember last night watched the Essex Police Interceptors after the repeat of Fifth Gear on Fiver channel, the burly police just barged in the house his mum screaming. Wait a minute, does not the police requires a warrant before they can enter a house?:eek:
Click to expand...

Para 1. Yep, a clear invasion of privacy if unlawful but, in all honesty I reckon highly unlikely.
Para 2. Did it have a Power of Entry? :devil:
Para 3. I'm sure the officers had a Power of Entry under PACE. A warrant is NOT required in lots of cases. Section 17 of PACE is normally more appropriate in day-day policing (details can be found on t'internet).
 
Last edited:
UnMarked said:
Para 1. Yep, a clear invasion of privacy if unlawful but, in all honesty I reckon highly unlikely.
Para 2. Did it have a Power of Entry? :devil:
Para 3. I'm sure the officers had a Power of Entry under PACE. A warrant is NOT required in lots of cases. Section 17 of PACE is normally more appropriate in day-day policing (details can be found on t'internet).
Click to expand...

This poor Essex guy was hiding in the attic and rolled on the itchy loft insulation and he was asking for a shirt, he was denied and driven off. :eek:
 
Dragon said:
This poor Essex guy was hiding in the attic and rolled on the itchy loft insulation and he was asking for a shirt, he was denied and driven off. :eek:
Click to expand...

Bless.:rolleyes: And what about his Human Rights eh?
 
The Police were chasing the (well known) Crim after he had commited an aggravated vehicle theft and evaded a Police persuit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom