Aterrasse
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2011
- Messages
- 114
- Car
- W212 - E-Estate 220CDI Bluefficiency
What colour is it?
Sand metallic type of colour with pitch black interior.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What colour is it?
It has full MB dealer history, all by myself and therefore covered under MB recovery scheme. I got it with merely 3,000 miles on the clock back in 2009. It was a demo vehicle from MB Peterborough (nice guys there, BTW). Just front tyres and front discs need changing in the next two months.
Alex
If it's as good as it sounds I'd be tempted to take it off your hands after a small profit for you!!
So £350 tyres, £200 brakes, too good to miss! (unless its anything like my brothers ML230, which breaks down, hits things and has other comedy driver related antics...)
Seems a no brainer to me.
^ its worth £13050
I thought so!
Alex
That V6 is a real jewel and never let me down once and the electrics is fine too. It would appear that regular servicing is essential with those beasts. I send mine once a year (always on the 29th December!) regardless of the mileage done over that year.
Alex
I think you've convinced your self its a keeper, and rightly so.
Agreed.
They will try and show you the CAP book, but ask them "Will you really auction an 08 plate car with 25k miles?"
The cheapest sub 40k mile 08 ML320cdi on Mercedes used at the moment is £20k, cheapest Sport is £21k.
Therefore I would aim for £17k and don't take a penny less.
Best thing to do is make the deal on the new E Class first, take in the drive the deal prices as they have up to 17% off the non AMG E Class estates at the moment, £9200 off an E350cgi that someone on pistonheads bought, so hammer a deal out first and then hit them with the trade in afterwards.
This is going to sound tactless to some, so apologies in advance. No offence meant - honestly.
There's some bizarre financial logic in parts of this thread, especially the idea that it's sensible to take on an expensive new finance contract because the value of the present car is 'evaporating to nothing', or because the gap to the price of a new car is increasing. After four years, most of the evaporating of value has already happened, and if you've been making the monthly payments out of income, you can make them to yourself instead and have a jar full of money ready for when you really do need to replace the car, or make some repairs along the way.
I came from the company car world, so was used to new cars. I bought my Volvo S60 at two years old when I left the job it came with and moved to one without, and somehow I've never found the right moment to part with it. (I spent most of my jar on a house move, which had some effect!) I've learned that there's nothing to fear from running a less-than-new car; apart from tyres and routine service items, mine needed nothing until the front pads at 96,000 miles and seven years. A couple of expensive items did wear out, but not until it was past 110,000, but even £2,000 on those was trifling compared to the depreciation on a new car.
My point is that, so long as it still does the job you bought it for, a four-year-old car that's never gone wrong has to be a keeper. Anything else is vanity.
Besides, I don't want anyone snapping up deals on E estates until I've got the one I want, so put your hands back in your pockets, Alex!
Tactless outburst ends.
Agreed, but that 'perceived value' has been expensively acquired in terms of payments made and value lost; it therefore makes sense to enjoy it while it lasts.Bobby Dazzler said:...
As the car's absolute value decreases ...its perceived value becomes increasingly out-of-synch with market value, making it more difficult to justify (a new one)
Also true, which is why Alex here has an opportunity to set himself up very nicely. He's evidently prepared to go on making payments by taking on a new car; if he set aside, say, £300 a month over the next two years, he'd have £7,200 to add to the value of his ML. That might drop from £17,000 to, say, £13,000 in the same period, but he'd still be £3,200 closer to a new car than he is today. If he then runs that next car for six years, his overall monthly cost includes the flatter middle-years of the depreciation curve rather than just the steep first three, and all without taking on the risk of a car first used by someone else.Bobby Dazzler said:...
If you originally had a monthly finance payment on the car, but you go for a period without (or at a lower rate), then you get used to the lower relative cost, making the new car more difficult to justify.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.