Smarties
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2008
- Messages
- 444
Hello fellow members and forum watchers. Just wondering if you would be so good as to contribute your thoughts on the following: My Dads 1996 C200 Auto (W202) 98000 miles, has become a real pain in the backside and money pit. It started 12 months ago when he noticed it was losing coolant/water and had to top up the bottle every so often. You guessed it, over the course of a month or so he noticed oil in his coolant. So he took it to his local workshop.
They said that the oil in the water was the wrong colour for engine oil and it was from the transmission oil cooler/ radiator. A new rad was ordered and fitted for approx £250.
All was well for a few months until in October 09, once again there was oil in the water that had this time turned to porridge. Car returned to the workshop, and this time Cylinder head/gasket was diagnosed. The head was stripped, sent off for it’s obligatory skimming, and eventually the car was returned with a bill for £850…job done. Or so we thought.
Last month, the car failed its MOT on emissions (first time my Dad has EVER had an MOT fail), even thought a full exhaust system and new catalyst was fitted less than a year ago. However, it was found that the C02 oxygen sensor had failed, possibly attributed to being fowled by the oil in water scenario. A new sensor fitted and all was well…or so we thought.
Last week, alerted by the amber glow of his low coolant warning light, and looking into his radiator, he found…oil in his water!!
The workshop are now saying to return it for them to look at, and horror of horrors, it maybe that the cylinder head is cracked!!
This is all on a car that covers approx 800 (yes eight hundred) miles a year, and has happened in those 800 miles. It has never been cooked or overheated during my Dad’s ownership (6 years), is serviced every year using fully synthetic oil, and is a genuinely pampered and very bright example.
Now to the nub of the question. Who should be paying for any subsequent work? as in my estimation, if the head has failed for whatever reason in 800 miles/10 months, is this acceptable? Even if it is found that the head is cracked, should the workshop or the people they sent it off to for machining/skimming 7 months ago not have tested and found this? Thanks for sticking with me, and your thoughts and contributions will be very much appreciated.
They said that the oil in the water was the wrong colour for engine oil and it was from the transmission oil cooler/ radiator. A new rad was ordered and fitted for approx £250.
All was well for a few months until in October 09, once again there was oil in the water that had this time turned to porridge. Car returned to the workshop, and this time Cylinder head/gasket was diagnosed. The head was stripped, sent off for it’s obligatory skimming, and eventually the car was returned with a bill for £850…job done. Or so we thought.
Last month, the car failed its MOT on emissions (first time my Dad has EVER had an MOT fail), even thought a full exhaust system and new catalyst was fitted less than a year ago. However, it was found that the C02 oxygen sensor had failed, possibly attributed to being fowled by the oil in water scenario. A new sensor fitted and all was well…or so we thought.
Last week, alerted by the amber glow of his low coolant warning light, and looking into his radiator, he found…oil in his water!!
The workshop are now saying to return it for them to look at, and horror of horrors, it maybe that the cylinder head is cracked!!
This is all on a car that covers approx 800 (yes eight hundred) miles a year, and has happened in those 800 miles. It has never been cooked or overheated during my Dad’s ownership (6 years), is serviced every year using fully synthetic oil, and is a genuinely pampered and very bright example.
Now to the nub of the question. Who should be paying for any subsequent work? as in my estimation, if the head has failed for whatever reason in 800 miles/10 months, is this acceptable? Even if it is found that the head is cracked, should the workshop or the people they sent it off to for machining/skimming 7 months ago not have tested and found this? Thanks for sticking with me, and your thoughts and contributions will be very much appreciated.