• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

HIGH mileage for E280 CDI Sport

MercedesDriver

MB Enthusiast
SUPPORTER
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,294
Location
Near the forest
Car
Jaguar XF Sportbrake 25t X260; Mini Cooper R50
Hi

What would you consider as a HIGH mileage for E280 CDI, if it has a nice MB service history?
What are your experiances?

I have seen some with low miles but ruined and some with 200k in almost mint condition.
 
Someone I know used to do 70,000 miles a year up and down the A14/M6 and his cars were mint at 4 years old.

But then you get someone who has used it in and out of cities with loads of speed bumps who only does 20k miles a year and they are battered at 4 years old.


Drive them, It's the only way to know I guess?
 
Someone I know used to do 70,000 miles a year up and down the A14/M6 and his cars were mint at 4 years old.

But then you get someone who has used it in and out of cities with loads of speed bumps who only does 20k miles a year and they are battered at 4 years old.

Drive them, It's the only way to know I guess?

I have this maybe nonsense opinion that if driven alot and with proper ontime maintenance is better than sitting in a dry shed and doing few k per year. At least when driven it is lubricated but then there is a wear. True/False?
 
What in years gone by was no issues with high mileage cars has, I think, has changed totally.

My old 124s with over 200K each need odd bits of wear and tear maintenance. Brake linings, tyres, happen glow plugs and window regulators for instance. But newer Mercedes are (IMO) big bills waiting to happen. SAMs, SRS lights, injectors, the "wonderful" replacements for servos, gearbox box ECUs, engine ECUs, air suspension legs and the like make the purchase of a modern high miler more fraught.
 
I disagree with the comment above regarding modern cars.

Cars are much more reliable these days than they 20, 30, 40 years ago. Yes they are more complicated, but they're inherently more reliable. Furthermore, modern cars tend to have much higher mileage relative to their age than those in previous vintages.

When I was growing up, it was rare to see a 10year+ car on the road, as most had been scrapped by then. Today, 10y and 20y are not uncommon and many are still in excellent condition.

I'm always been amused by those that state that cars were more reliable X years ago, and then go on to announce that they've only had one reconditioned engine, a gearbox rebuild and a couple of suspension refreshes in the Xk the car has done.

Mileage is not the issue here, as long as the car has been maintained correctly and looked after, I don't see any issues between a car of similar age with 200k and 40k. Provided the mileage is reflected in the price and,as with any second hand purchase, you are happy to get any issues resolved.

As already mentioned by others, I have seen cars with less than 100k which I wouldn't touch with a bargepole, and others with twice that which are as good as new.

Arguably age is more of an issue, as certain components will age over time and will need replacement, most notably suspension parts. I tend to fnd 10 years is when these items will need replacing, but again this also depends on the previous care and servicing that's taken place.

Buy on condition, service history and age. Mileage comes down the list.

The complexity of modern cars does mean that there is greater scope for things to go wrong. As in previous years, a healthy second hand parts supply at the breakers yard and half decent mechanic means that problems can still be overcome when they arise.

There are relatively few cars on the road 20yrs+. That's because the good ones are kept going and the not so good get scrapped. I dare to suggest that the same will be the case with todays cars.

Don't believe those that insist just because they drive a 40 year old car that's been well maintained that newer cars aren't capable of reaching the same age or mileage without serious issue. As previously stated buy on condition, research the model you interested (eg. SBC and Valeo rads on W211) to ensure you are aware of potential issues, get the car serviced regularly, budget a small amount for repairs and enjoy whichever car you choose.

Regards, Neil
 
Last edited:
My two 211 220cdi's did 315k miles each in 3-4 years, and my current 212 220cdi has done 185k in 3 years.

All had/have full Mercedes history and no major issues whatsoever. High motorway mileage with proper servicing is the key.
 
I find both points by trapperjohn and neil true and both are with presumtions of proper maintenance.
The thing is that because of modern car complexities maintenance costs are often unacceptable high (SBC, ABC, ECUs, etc.) and when these misfortunes happen we turn to breakers and not OEMs.
And the biggest problem is that even if you did the service with MB OEM part in MB garage it doesn't mean that you will not have the same issue again in near future.
My belief is that owners shouldn't be responsible anyhow for for example ECU malfunction or wiring looms. Certain malfunctions are caused only because of bad technical solutions which MB has adopted, and usually after few years and "facelift" they abandon certain ideas.
Example: Short wing mirror wires on W215 CL500s. Happens that when you fold mirrors wires got ripped off. Why do we have to pay for this service, ever?
 
My two 211 220cdi's did 315k miles each in 3-4 years, and my current 212 220cdi has done 185k in 3 years.

All had/have full Mercedes history and no major issues whatsoever. High motorway mileage with proper servicing is the key.

Fully agree. Run it as much as possible and maintain properly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom