I’ve never driven a Tesla of any sort but the model 3 seems to get generally decent reviews.
Worst car driven this century - that’s quite a statement!
Well, this century only started 23 years ago.
As I’ve said - frequently - I want to run an EV asap, but it has to be fit for purpose.
Six weeks and 1500 miles is a fair trial of the 3 Long Range. Like the convenience of an EV, the big screen, even although it’s far from intuitive, the speed and simplicity of a supercharger, although it’s irrelevant to anyone living inside the M25, and the quiet drive train, although the cabin is measurably noisier (75db in the Burbs) than a 3 series or E class, thanks to wind noise, thumpy suspension. and the creaky cabin.
The handling is ponderous, the steering’s inaccurate, the car thumps around on poor surfaces, controls are often difficult to find, the declared range is inaccurate, the build quality, paint choices and paint finish is poor, and soft / easily marked. All round visibility is poor, with a “b” pillar that blocks the view over your should, a letterbox rear window, and difficulty seeing the edges of the car. Even with its dozen cameras, this thing is more difficult to park than a BMW 3 or Mercedes E.
There’s no way that the Tesla 3 is competitive to a BMW 3 series, C Class or Audi A4. Not in a month of Sundays.
Yes, the Tesla 3 reduces CO2. By less than the 3 tonnes of CO2 created by a Chinese student flying to the UK (return) to study at a British University. Is this any justification for buying a poor quality, over-priced, first generation EV saloon ?
It’s interesting that the Press steers well clear of EV to ICE comparisons. It smells of Emperor’s New Clothes.
If you’re thinking of buying a Tesla 3, rent one from Hertz and see what you think. (If you have to take a company EV because of the income tax break, look closely at the EV6 and Ioniq.