I think these posts would be better off in the dedicated EV thread that we have now?
It’s one of the main reasons I generally avoid it as it’s one of those threads that just goes around in circles, with the same people desperately googling facts and figures to support a view that they have on the subject and refuse to change.
This thread was about a fire in a car park, not charging efficiency or whatever.
The whole purpose of the update on this thread was to clarify that the fire was categorically caused by a diesel Range Rover and not an EV as some people might have assumed
Here is the dedicated EV thread:
It’s one of the main reasons I generally avoid it as it’s one of those threads that just goes around in circles, with the same people desperately googling facts and figures to support a view that they have on the subject and refuse to change.
This thread was about a fire in a car park, not charging efficiency or whatever.
The whole purpose of the update on this thread was to clarify that the fire was categorically caused by a diesel Range Rover and not an EV as some people might have assumed
Here is the dedicated EV thread:
Can we try and stick to facts (such as they are) that are reported in main stream media , preferably from more than one scource ? They will of course on many occassions be bought to us via social media by either people who are 100% conviced that EV's are the future and those who have polar opposite views...and everyone in between.
It will be hard to ignore the messenger , in the two clips I post here one is a softly spoken Kiwi bloke and the other is John C , but it is the message that must be the truth and not the opinion.
Disclaimer.
It will be hard to ignore the messenger , in the two clips I post here one is a softly spoken Kiwi bloke and the other is John C , but it is the message that must be the truth and not the opinion.
Disclaimer.
- I do not work in the car industry , I have...
- Petrol Pete
- Replies: 6,858
- Forum: Electric Mercedes models