bolide said:
The CoC bears responsibility for his decision to start and stop a race, and to deploy the safety car - as in this case. The accident appeared to occur under safety car conditions and isn't something "he should be made to answer for"
Nor should the (unpaid, voluntary) marshals "be made to answer for" not getting to the car in time to save the drivers life - whilst risking their own
Hi Nick,
I am not one of these left wing meely mouse spoil sports that want to ruin anyone's fun. BUT............ In a competitive sport that is highly dangerous there must be some sort of restraint, control and responsibility from outside the cockpit.
You state the safety car was out?? I have absolutely no knowledge of this incident and am always inclined to believe what other, more knowledgeable members have written. However even if the safety car was out, there was not enough time for it to collect all the cars and get them to slow down?? Just watch the marshall on the gantry with his flags and see what ones he waves. However I feel the safety car issue is irrelevant in this isolated circumstance.
I say the race should either have not started IF the conditions were similar to those we witnessed? Or if it slowly deteriorated then before the visibility became non existant, fetch out the safety car and hope the rain quickly passes, but to allow racing in those conditions is NOT racing it is simply a Darwinian exercise in getting rid of reckless drivers who have no respect for human life. If you were leading the race would you have slowed because of restricted visibility?? would you allow a faster travelling car to overtake?? (No warning flags are being displayed)
I certainly never mentioned the voluntary marshalls who do an excellent job, I picked on the Clerk of the Course who in my humble opinion is their to protect not only the drivers, but the marshall's, track officials, public and anyone else's safety at the circuit.
To condone actually racing in those conditions beggars belief, and to talk about restraint is in itself a contradiction. Racing is all about winning, and unfortunately driver safety, crowd safety is secondary, I would cite Kimi Raikkonen as an example. If he wanted points he would not have driven a car that was clearly in a dangerous condition, (when a front tyre had flat spotted and was clearly way out of balance) he like any other driver wanted to win...... (I understand his reasons and no doubt would have done EXACTLY the same thing)
In rain like we witnessed in that short video clip there would be NO visibilty when closing on the car in front, no awareness of slower travelling vehicles, no awareness of crashed vehicles on the track, no awareness of marshall's attempting to rescue trapped drivers..... The incident we witnessed was always going to happen.
I have watched motor bike racing where the lead rider deemed that conditions were getting dangerous and actually slowed, he was engulfed by the persuing pack, and lost the race. To leave any type of decision to the driver\rider would always be open to abuse, there must be an independant official responsible for making these type of decisions.
Sorry to disagree with you as I am an ardent motor sport fan but I enjoy the racing and not the carnage.
Take care,
John