HumberMart
Active Member
And if you value the nice discreet Ambient lighting your 211 has you can wave goodbye to that in a 212 as well. Why remove a good feature you've just thought up?
Personally think the 212 dash is hellish. Silver and black plastic and switches scattered everywhere.
It's only the base spec SE that misses out on ambient lighting, but maybe your point is that it's not 'nice and discreet' - I think it was Car Magazine that described it as looking like a Jazz bar!
All a matter of taste of course, I'm pretty hard to please, and change my car like socks, but I do like the W212 interior, even in basic SE spec.
Some cars just seem to 'feel right' and for me the W212 (saloon) does. I didn't think the SLK I had did (too 'hard' inside, unresponsive auto gearbox, less direct steering than the E Class). I don't think my wife's B180 feels right either (ride/steering) although it looks good inside and out. The W212 is certainly better than the 520D I had, even though it was the SE on 17" wheels and had luxury/memory pack etc. it was still too much of a compromise in terms of ride and cramped low driving position.
I must say that the R Class came very close to 'feeling right', just the sheer size of it stopped it.
There are some aspects of the W212 that do feel a bit 'lightweight' and tend to question the solidity of the build, but I think the key is the term 'lightweight', to help earn the BE tag, but also to cut production costs. You can pay the same money for a well spec'd Insignia/Mondeo and prob even a Golf by the time you've added a few toys.
The W212 seems to be taking a bit of a kicking in this thread (mainly from non-owners?), but I find it a very likeable car. OK we have the horror of the injector issues hanging over us (if you have the 2.1D engine that is), but I'd recommend them wholeheartedly.