Hi All
I recently bought a 2013 E220 CDI with 67kmiles on the clock super clean car with almost full main dealer history. Only the last service was done by the car dealer that I bought the car from so im guessing they used a local indy and just changed the oil & filter.
I don't drive the car too much and its our 2nd car primarily used for long trips and outings rather than in the city. We have another petrol small car for those kind of short trips. That being said im not sure how the car was used before I bought it.
Recently I noticed that if i let the car sit for over a week, when i first start it up i do get the dreaded chain noise for 3-4 seconds. But after having run the car for a bit if i let it sit for a day or 2 i dont get the noise on a cold start. So seems like it happens only when the car has sat for long and the tensioner has drained.
The question I have is, is this normal? Is it to be expected that the oil will drain out from the tensioner if the car is sat for long periods? Or is it a sign of the tensioner failing? Also given that the car has done only 67k and has been serviced regularly I was thinking of only getting the tensioner done rather than both the chain and tensioner as reading on this topic, it sounds like the chain shouldn't stretch if its been serviced regularly but the tensioners are prone to failure. Does this sound right? Should i just change the tensioner?
I got quotes from 2 MB specialist in northwest London and one quoted around £260 to just do the tensioner. The other one quoted close to £550 saying that the rocker cover needs to be removed and the cams locked i clarified i just want the tensioner done not the chain. They confirmed that to do just the tensioner they set the timing and lock the cams and that if I want to do the chain as well im looking at close to £1100 with them. They said others might risk it by not locking the cams we don't. It doesn't make sense to me that they would want to lock the cams just to change the tensioner as the crank or cam probably wouldn't move and the timing shouldn't change just the chain would become lose and tight in situ. What are your thoughts on this? Does the cam need to be locked?
Here is the noise I am talking about.
I recently bought a 2013 E220 CDI with 67kmiles on the clock super clean car with almost full main dealer history. Only the last service was done by the car dealer that I bought the car from so im guessing they used a local indy and just changed the oil & filter.
I don't drive the car too much and its our 2nd car primarily used for long trips and outings rather than in the city. We have another petrol small car for those kind of short trips. That being said im not sure how the car was used before I bought it.
Recently I noticed that if i let the car sit for over a week, when i first start it up i do get the dreaded chain noise for 3-4 seconds. But after having run the car for a bit if i let it sit for a day or 2 i dont get the noise on a cold start. So seems like it happens only when the car has sat for long and the tensioner has drained.
The question I have is, is this normal? Is it to be expected that the oil will drain out from the tensioner if the car is sat for long periods? Or is it a sign of the tensioner failing? Also given that the car has done only 67k and has been serviced regularly I was thinking of only getting the tensioner done rather than both the chain and tensioner as reading on this topic, it sounds like the chain shouldn't stretch if its been serviced regularly but the tensioners are prone to failure. Does this sound right? Should i just change the tensioner?
I got quotes from 2 MB specialist in northwest London and one quoted around £260 to just do the tensioner. The other one quoted close to £550 saying that the rocker cover needs to be removed and the cams locked i clarified i just want the tensioner done not the chain. They confirmed that to do just the tensioner they set the timing and lock the cams and that if I want to do the chain as well im looking at close to £1100 with them. They said others might risk it by not locking the cams we don't. It doesn't make sense to me that they would want to lock the cams just to change the tensioner as the crank or cam probably wouldn't move and the timing shouldn't change just the chain would become lose and tight in situ. What are your thoughts on this? Does the cam need to be locked?
Here is the noise I am talking about.