sgregory124
MB Enthusiast
Evening all,
My car was in at my favourite indie for a new traction battery today, whilst there they gave it a quick once over and mentioned that my rear discs are 80% worn.
Couple of questions....
What would be considered a 'reasonable cost' for replacement? The indie quoted me roughly £1100, but didn't mention if that was parts only or parts and labour. Based on what I've seen online, it looks like a parts only price to me.
Secondly, prior to me picking the car up from the place I bought it from, it had been into Mercedes Beaconsfield for new front pads, whereupon I'm assuming they would have done a complete check of the brakes (amongst other things) whilst it was there. Surely if the rear discs were that worn, they would have highlighted that on any report? Or is this just folly and am I just delaying the inevitable wallet emptying session?
Don't get me wrong, I'm a seasoned owner these days and I know what these cars cost to maintain, but like anyone, I don't want to have to fork out unnecessarily if the brakes are actually fine for a little longer.
Opinions and any advice welcome, although please don't suggest I change the brakes myself - I'm not a mechanic, I don't have the time, patience, tools nor inclination to do it.
Thanks in advance!
My car was in at my favourite indie for a new traction battery today, whilst there they gave it a quick once over and mentioned that my rear discs are 80% worn.
Couple of questions....
What would be considered a 'reasonable cost' for replacement? The indie quoted me roughly £1100, but didn't mention if that was parts only or parts and labour. Based on what I've seen online, it looks like a parts only price to me.
Secondly, prior to me picking the car up from the place I bought it from, it had been into Mercedes Beaconsfield for new front pads, whereupon I'm assuming they would have done a complete check of the brakes (amongst other things) whilst it was there. Surely if the rear discs were that worn, they would have highlighted that on any report? Or is this just folly and am I just delaying the inevitable wallet emptying session?
Don't get me wrong, I'm a seasoned owner these days and I know what these cars cost to maintain, but like anyone, I don't want to have to fork out unnecessarily if the brakes are actually fine for a little longer.
Opinions and any advice welcome, although please don't suggest I change the brakes myself - I'm not a mechanic, I don't have the time, patience, tools nor inclination to do it.
Thanks in advance!