• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Should Brake Pads be worn out after 8k miles

Glad it's sorted

On a side note, rear brake pads in 10k is not unusual for these cars and would expect fronts to last double that. The rears are used for most things i.e. cruise control braking
 
Glad it's sorted

On a side note, rear brake pads in 10k is not unusual for these cars and would expect fronts to last double that. The rears are used for most things i.e. cruise control braking
I must be super light on brakes. In over 50k I have not had front or rear pads or discs. As for rears wearing out before the fronts, never happened in my world, on any car.
Does cruise control really use the brakes to regulate speed? I would have thought that it was throttle modulation, but I could be corrected.
 
Just shows the muppets that are in the MB garages now,nowhere is safe from the loonies,as always find a good specialist and stick to him.
 
I must be super light on brakes. In over 50k I have not had front or rear pads or discs. As for rears wearing out before the fronts, never happened in my world, on any car.
Does cruise control really use the brakes to regulate speed? I would have thought that it was throttle modulation, but I could be corrected.
Adaptive Cruise Control on my Mini will apply braking as necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHS
I think I still hold the record for the most miles on a set of front pads.

 
I think that record comes hand in hand with the record for "having the least fun driving a car"!!!!!;)
 
I must be super light on brakes. In over 50k I have not had front or rear pads or discs. As for rears wearing out before the fronts, never happened in my world, on any car.
Does cruise control really use the brakes to regulate speed? I would have thought that it was throttle modulation, but I could be corrected.

Yes applies the brakes down hills. W205 also seems to be set up to brake with the rear as well to prevent it diving.

Think I am due a change and only had the rear pads and discs fitted in January. I've done about 8k since.

Fronts are still on factory brakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHS
Yes applies the brakes down hills. W205 also seems to be set up to brake with the rear as well to prevent it diving.

Think I am due a change and only had the rear pads and discs fitted in January. I've done about 8k since.

Fronts are still on factory brakes.
Surely you would knock off the cruise when going downhill, your wasting energy, and in your case brake pads.
I’ve just changed my rear discs and pads at 55,000 miles, they were still ok but the awful internal handbrake shoes had rusted and failed.
I always prefer to coast down hills.
 
Surely you would knock off the cruise when going downhill, your wasting energy, and in your case brake pads.
I’ve just changed my rear discs and pads at 55,000 miles, they were still ok but the awful internal handbrake shoes had rusted and failed.
I always prefer to coast down hills.
Surely if you are on the speed limit at the top of the hill, if you just coast down the hill you'll pick up speed, so to stay within the limit you would need to apply the brakes at some point?
 
Yes applies the brakes down hills. W205 also seems to be set up to brake with the rear as well to prevent it diving.

Think I am due a change and only had the rear pads and discs fitted in January. I've done about 8k since.

Fronts are still on factory brakes.
My S205 has not had either front or rear discs or pads in the 50k+ miles that I have had it.
I must say that if I needed rear pads after 8k miles would be looking for a problem. As I posted above, rears wearing out before the fronts, never happened in my world, on any car,ever. Regardless of the cruise control, the vast majority of braking is on the front, hence bigger discs on the front. Of course the rears also contribute to the stopping power and are not there solely to prevent diving.
 
Surely if you are on the speed limit at the top of the hill, if you just coast down the hill you'll pick up speed, so to stay within the limit you would need to apply the brakes at some point?
That really depends on the slope of the hill, on a motorway or dual carriageway where cruise is often used, you would be hard pushed to go more than 5 mph over the limit, I travel to Lincoln from Leics nearly every week, you could feel the braking if cruise was on.
I now coast down those slopes.
 
My S205 has not had either front or rear discs or pads in the 50k+ miles that I have had it.
I must say that if I needed rear pads after 8k miles would be looking for a problem. As I posted above, rears wearing out before the fronts, never happened in my world, on any car,ever. Regardless of the cruise control, the vast majority of braking is on the front, hence bigger discs on the front. Of course the rears also contribute to the stopping power and are not there solely to prevent diving.
Extremely common misconception. Many modern Volvos are set up to use the rear brakes first, to prevent diving mostly but also because light braking doesn't require load on the front brakes.

Front brakes are bigger yet but when you're braking lightly they barely get used. Same situation with cruise control on. ESC also uses the rear brakes

That really depends on the slope of the hill, on a motorway or dual carriageway where cruise is often used, you would be hard pushed to go more than 5 mph over the limit, I travel to Lincoln from Leics nearly every week, you could feel the braking if cruise was on.
I now coast down those slopes.
Try coasting down some of the hills going to Whitby or Scarborough, you'll be going down 15mph over the speed limit as a minimum. My transmission also drops the revs down a hill and when coasting so no engine braking.
 
“Try coasting down some of the hills going to Whitby or Scarborough, you'll be going down 15mph over the speed limit as a minimum. My transmission also drops the revs down a hill and when coasting so no engine“

Now you’re aware of this just enter the top of the hill 15mph slower, you will save fuel and brake pads.
 
“Try coasting down some of the hills going to Whitby or Scarborough, you'll be going down 15mph over the speed limit as a minimum. My transmission also drops the revs down a hill and when coasting so no engine“

Now you’re aware of this just enter the top of the hill 15mph slower, you will save fuel and brake pads.

So you're suggesting going up a hill at 45mph to come down at 60mph rather than just going at 60mph all the way through? Don't think it'd make much difference regardless
 
So you're suggesting going up a hill at 45mph to come down at 60mph rather than just going at 60mph all the way through? Don't think it'd make much difference regardless
Wasn’t meant to be taken too seriously, but something wrong if your rears only last 8,000 miles,
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHS
Wasn’t meant to be taken too seriously, but something wrong if your rears only last 8,000 miles,

I mean they look like they're nearly gone. But likely will last another 2-3k. Previous ones were about 12k as well. Nothing wrong with the brakes and pads are genuine.

Might be my habit of gunning it on these country roads on the way home
 
If the brakes are in good order and the car is not being driven by someone with his/her foot on the brake the whole time then pads should last for between 40 and 100k ish miles. My 211 estate used to do about 60k fronts and 80k rears. Main dealers have got people used to the idea that brakes need replacing every 20k miles; they don't.
And rear brakes getting worn out to that extent by CC is utter nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHS
HI,
When we had our 2015 ML63 AMG - that used to eat rear brake pads - although we hardly used the brakes that much.
The car was driven on mainly motorways by my wife to and from her work - always with Adaptive Cruise Control set.
The ACC was definitely the reason that rear pads wore out so fast!
Cheers
Steve
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom