flango
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
So the fuels are different - due to the adittive packs. Which means that it does make a difference which brand of fuel you choose.
The issue is that unless you have access to independant testing data, it is anyone's guess which fuel is actually better.
And customers end-up going by the marketing hype.
(PS - My understanding is that the above does not apply to Shell V-Power, which is the only car fuel in the UK that is made separately from other fuels).
The other issue is the petrol station itself... where contamination can occur regardless of fuel brand.
I would have thought that large/busy petrol stations, e.g. at motorway services, are less likely to suffer from local contamination, due to high turnover and presumably better and more robust maintenance procedures?
Our fuel and lubricant additives division supply the majority of the majors and there are significant differences between the packages supplied to the various companies. Also specs change and packages are frequently updated. So there is a difference but like Markjay says spec is usually turned into marketing B.S. so the consumer doesn't know what to choose. So you pay your money and takes your chance.
Personally I use Shell and Texaco so make of that what you will. When I went for another super unleaded instead of V Power I ended up with the problems posted above. Not down to the fuel and additives but down to poor tank management and stale fuel