alfl23
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2016
- Messages
- 43
- Location
- London
- Car
- '14 S350D, '15 S63 Coupe, Tesla S P100D, Roadster '20, McL 720S, Ferrari F12
OK.
I've owned a face-lift 2013 C63 AMG for 18 months and it has cost me nothing in maintenance other than the service pack which is 40 odd quid a month. I've done 10,000 miles on the same set of (brand new tyres) the car had on it when I bought it with 11,000 miles on it. I use it to commute into Manchester City centre every day and I take it on fast drives in North Wales and Yorkshire whenever I can. I've been to Germany in it, Cornwall in it and London twice. I'm on 19 inch alloys.
Not one thing has gone wrong with it.
My average mpg is 19mpg.
It has been the most bullet proof and reliable car I've owned so far.
What you have said is 0% true for my AMG ownership experience so I think you are misleading the OP with excessive negativity which is probably borne out of frustration that you have never owned the very car he is asking about.
You cannot be an expert in something you have never experienced. The OP is asking about the experience of owning an AMG - you don't have that experience yet you have posted more in here than anyone else.
It isn't helpful to anyone.
My thoughts exactly right now, C63 and E63 are much better things to own, and from a lot of people on the forum they have proven to be far better experiences. A lot of you here also praise the E55, C63, E63, SL63/65 and a few other distinct models, I'm very inclined to listen to people who know what they are talking about. I've not done anywhere near enough miles over enough AMGs to be all wise about them, and I think I also had quite a bid of bad luck with the car, which adds to my own personal bad experience with the brand. Flat tyre twice as well, both times at 4AM with me waking up to beat traffic on a long drive, things like that I cannot really blame Merc for, but there's this feeling in the back of my head that the car has gone into service every 3 weeks, and it kind of has, with some very big under warranty repairs for a car that had barely, 10, 15k miles at the time.
I think the dry weight of the C and E are a better fit for the rest of the components which look reasonably identical. I always felt the wear and tear of pads, discs, suspension, tires, is a little bit extreme, and while I'm not a mechanic, when I play with the configurators of the various models, the parts look like the same things, same dimension, regardless of the series. Driving style has a good impact sure, but it feels they bolted a badge and a slightly bigger bodywork without re-adjusting a great deal of the other parts of the car. Now I'm pretty much sure I've paid a small fortune for badge that says "S", 10% fancier leather and massage seats that I never use anyway.
Engine is the same, torque is the same, no 4Matic but I get Curve Control which is fun twice a year as you need Lake District like roads to enjoy it. 2018 model seems to fit the exact same bill, exact same HP, 4.0 V8 9G tronic as the E63s. The S coupe has pretty much heavily tanked, and will likely go full CL shortly, wiping a nice £100k of the RRP. If I can do any good to any forum member here, is to recommend that you don't buy it, I have a feeling it's not going to be the long hold car that the way models like CL500/65, E55, SL and so on have been for a lot of people.
I've had massive problems with electrics across the board already, in a 3 year old car, so I can only imagine what all their fancy automatically retractable seat rack etc will behave like in another 5 - 8 years, it scares me to be the guy owning this out of warranty in 5 years time.
Last edited: