alfl23
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2016
- Messages
- 43
- Location
- London
- Car
- '14 S350D, '15 S63 Coupe, Tesla S P100D, Roadster '20, McL 720S, Ferrari F12
OK, I'll be less concise:
Whinging about depreciation on a new AMG is nonsensical. Compare it to an equivalent M Series car and it's comparable. More upmarket and tasteful, but comparable in terms of depreciation. If you want to avoid steep depreciation, buy used cars. And be wary of recent classic car price growth - Quantitative Easing has pushed all kinds of money into alternative assets from Art to Astons, but that's a one off jump. Don't expect your million pound DB5 to continue growing in price.
Comparing AMG ownerships costs to a Ferrari is nonsensical. No-one, but no-one can put a Ferrari through equivalent usage without deep maintenance and reliability pain. Look in any showroom and see how many cars have more than 60,000 miles on the clock: hardly any. Ten year old 599 with 20k miles on the clock? That'll be £100+k worth of depreciation, sir, call it a fiver a mile.
OK - my personal ownership experience of Ferrari is only from the 550 and 360, but I have plenty of friends who admit the same. Visit a Ferrari owners club meet and you'll hear the same. They cost big money, and problems are often almost impossible to resolve by the dealers. And this is on cars with less than 20k miles on the clock. In addition, the typical 2 or 2+2 seater Ferrari doesn't have the all round usability of your average AMG. It's not the same product.
All car companies offer poor after sales service, especially at the luxury end. Throw in the example of the Lexus LS and you have an exception but, seriously, the LS600 might be the personal choice of Bill Gates, but no-one else thinks it's an AMG competitor. You can't begin to even consider the LS600 as a competitor to an AMG performance car. It's a great car to drive 250,000 miles round the M25, but Chris Harris will never eulogise its performance.
The message that people appear to be giving you here is not "either get in line with the programme or don't buy." It was don't be naive about how idyllic other brands are, or how idyllic Mercedes used to be. You can run off to McLaren, Bentley or Rolls Royce, but rest assured you'll see similar issues there. While the Mercedes of the 1980's were more unaffordable than they are today, their design, manufacturing, safety and reliability issues were immense. And, frankly, they were neither as fast, nor as safe as today's cars.
Now that's a very useful piece of content, different ballpark, thank you. I think I've been very lucky holding the other cars, and not so much with the Merc. Mileage per car wise though, there's clearly no comparison as you say, I think my logic overstepped that element while looking at spreadsheets, and missing out on many other details in the process, that's a very solid point.
Anyway, happy motoring, hopefully I'll be healthy and in a position to work and do my part to keep AMG in business for some years before I throw in the towel and get a Lexus.