I wonder if Vennels and the rest of the crew are aiming to use the Ernest Saunders defence!
Their powers of recollection are staggeringly poor.
Their powers of recollection are staggeringly poor.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
delMs Vennels has apparently admitted that the evidence given to MPs wasn't true... Despicable! She should be spending some time in one of His Majesty's hotels.
???
Yep along with the blood transfusion perps.Ms Vennels has apparently admitted that the evidence given to MPs wasn't true... Despicable! She should be spending some time in one of His Majesty's hotels.
Especially those that continued to procure blood products from the USA even though the risks there had been identified. Those in the USA that knowingly sold infected blood products to the UK (and perhaps elsewhere) should also be brought to justice, though the chances of that happening are probably vanishingly small.Yep along with the blood transfusion perps.
I'd reign in that optimism. I think your overstating the likelihood of justice or procecution by an order of magnitude or two. This feels like it's got inneptitude, corruption, arrogance and greed woven through it at all senior levels within major organisations and public services. It feels like a 'too big to admit' problem so the machine will get to work making a public song an dance about it so the thick public (who broadly didn't give two hoots before it was a TV show) can feel better about themselves before getting back to the important stuff like culture wars over trivial issues (rather than asking questions about the big stuff).Those in the USA that knowingly sold infected blood products to the UK (and perhaps elsewhere) should also be brought to justice, though the chances of that happening are probably vanishingly small.
It's bit scrappy today methinks.Vennels reduced to tears again during a brutal interrogation by Sam Stein KC.
His line of questioning rather akin to "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
This is as close to a public flogging as you'll see in Britain!!!
and also,What chance that absolutely NOBODY will pay for this with prison time? Clearly a lot of people's reputations are in tatters but that's cold comfort to the subbies I'm sure.
How some of these people sleep at night is beyond me.
She has to take responsibility as the CEO but I am left with the opinion, and I have been watching the inquisition, that she relied very heavily on her managers in an effort not to micro manage. Instead she was a weak manager and the subordinates actually ran the show, keeping much from her.It's bit scrappy today methinks.
Beer QC showed a far greater level of skill. Rather than saying "this is your own creation isn't it", he would demonstrate that it was.
With the battering Vennells has had today there is increased danger of her gaining some sympathy.
But I was wrong with my earlier assumption. She has held up better than I expected.
She's still massively complicit in the many injustices, imho.
I worked under Fred Goodwin for three years until I retired in 2003. I my interest in the inquiry was learning how certain aspects of POL were run, particularly as RBS frequently recruited ex Post Office employees.She has to take responsibility as the CEO but I am left with the opinion, and I have been watching the inquisition, that she relied very heavily on her managers in an effort not to micro manage. Instead she was a weak manager and the subordinates actually ran the show, keeping much from her.
IMO these managers/subordinates are complicit and should also be quizzed.
I would have thought that she would have had a lot input from lawyers.I believe efforts are being made to relieve her of around £3m of ill-gotten gains - it would be a gesture anyway...
Many were and more will be.She has to take responsibility as the CEO but I am left with the opinion, and I have been watching the inquisition, that she relied very heavily on her managers in an effort not to micro manage. Instead she was a weak manager and the subordinates actually ran the show, keeping much from her.
IMO these managers/subordinates are complicit and should also be quizzed.
If this were true then she wasn't needed to take the P.O. from loss making into profit. I mean surely anyone could have said, "just get on with it, and don't bother me with details".She has to take responsibility as the CEO but I am left with the opinion, and I have been watching the inquisition, that she relied very heavily on her managers in an effort not to micro manage. Instead she was a weak manager and the subordinates actually ran the show, keeping much from her.
Well yeh, if those culpable can be all be found, I would imagine that their defence will be "it was 'er, she told me to."IMO these managers/subordinates are complicit and should also be quizzed.
The woman is a ****ing disgrace.Vennells and other PO officials should be locked up however not much mention of Fujitsu, they should return every penny the PO paid them and also be totally responsible for all compensation paid to victims. They’re the ones that defended/lied/altered their dodgy software all in the name of maintaining a financial contract.
I’ve watched this story develop since it broke in Computer Weekly all those years ago and I’ve never seen anything that clearly defines whether it was Fujitsu lying to the Post Office, or the Post Office choosing to ignore warnings (from Fujitsu) regarding the data errors that lead to the wrongful prosecutions.however not much mention of Fujitsu, they should return every penny the PO paid them and also be totally responsible for all compensation paid to victims. They’re the ones that defended/lied/altered their dodgy software
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.