Respect to your sense of humour and enjoy what you enjoy and don't watch what you don't like. Oh and don't watch QI![]()
![]()
John
whats wrong with QI?
![Devil :devil: :devil:](/styles/mbclub/smilies/devil.gif)
![Wink ;) ;)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Respect to your sense of humour and enjoy what you enjoy and don't watch what you don't like. Oh and don't watch QI![]()
![]()
John
whats wrong with QI?![]()
![]()
Putting on my sensible hat and answering your question in a sensible manner then yes I personally think it was acceptable and hate this being afraid of to say anything in case we upset a certain sectiion of society. I have absolutely no idea of this person's sexuality and don't give a fig one way or the other. These three presentators are not only work colleagues, they are good friends and where was everyone's outrage when the hamster?? Is that offensive? anyway when the hamster accused Clarkson of being gay when he bought his SLK? This whole show is scripted and if this remark was offensive do you honestly think James May would have allowed it? Why oh why must we interpret ulterior motives into what these entertainers say? Each of them shares being the butt of one type of jokje or another and yes it is not poloitically correct and what a shame this sword hovers over our modern TV entertainers.John, this week I happened to catch top gear for the first time in ages and after the first couple of minutes of me watching he called James May a homosexual in a derogatory tone of voice. My how the audience laughed.
Is that really so funny? Why do homosexuals need to be referred to in a negative way?
I think its in pretty poor taste myself, and it perpetuates negative stereotypes which is wrong. But as I say, I seem to be in the minority here.
Hopefully we all accept your views in the spirirt they were expressed. I just hate being told what is or is not funny and I usually press a button to change channels if I don't like any specific program.btw, I have no idea about whether James May is gay or not, the point is about using the term in a derogatory way, and perpetuating negative stereotypes. Its the same thing when foreigners are insulted too.
As I say, I appear to have very different views to the majority of posters on this thread. I have made my point so I will bow out gracefully.
John, this week I happened to catch top gear for the first time in ages and after the first couple of minutes of me watching he called James May a homosexual in a derogatory tone of voice. My how the audience laughed.
Is that really so funny? Why do homosexuals need to be referred to in a negative way?
I think its in pretty poor taste myself, and it perpetuates negative stereotypes which is wrong. But as I say, I seem to be in the minority here.
Robbie is right - "gay" is not a pejorative and should not be used as such.
Note that I didn't actually watch the episode in question, I'm just generically agreeing with the sentiment. Often people start using phrases in a certain way, and begin to believe that it is culturally acceptable to do so, without thinking of the effect those phrases have on the people described by those phrases.
-simon
all homophobics should burn in hell with a stake up thei ar$e
Top Gear and QI are my two must sees, do you find Stephen Fry offensive when He remarks about Homosexuals or any other sexual for that matter? Or is that acceptable to you because He is gay?
In my view these aren't insults, they are amusing jocular remarks, which are just plain funny.
At what point does a cultural or sexual observation become and insult?
Would the the jokes about the Indian Mothers and Grandmothers have been just as funny if a white comedian was telling them or would that have been a racist Jibe.
Top gear is funny, which is why it's one of BBC2 biggest grossing programs ever and syndicated to hundreds of countries world wide, hundreds of millions of people watch it, because it's just plain funny and entertaining.
Feel free to turn it off, don't watch it, it won't then offend your sensibilities.
As for you suggesting you're controversial, I wouldn't agree with that...narrow minded maybe but certainly not controversial.
I disagree,
He is definitely very anti the politically correct brigade and says what a huge audience agree's with, I hate all these modern 'obias' and I have a very broad sense of humour that will laugh at things that I think are funny and if that is being ebby-geebee-phobia then so be it, but two fingers to the politically correct police that try to tell me what I should find amusing.
John
I recall from my history classes that somewhere around 2000 years ago it was considered good entertainment to put christians and lions together. Just to be clear I am not suggesting we start this up again, at least not for a generic group (maybe just the odd politician or celeb).
However my point is that society in time deemed this to be unreasonable behaviour and so it disappeared (yes I know I am oversimplyfying). Same with various other activities over the centuries.
The main thing to take from this is that at least we live in a country where we can have the discussion.
And I can't see why the indian comedians jokes can't be used by anyone else. They aren't designed to insult regadless of the person telling them......that's the difference.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.