• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

COMAND not taking the fastest route

Hi , My car was serviced recently and had issues with the radio in that the bass , middle and treble have returned to zero.

The sat nav won't go into the daylight mode.

Any suggestions and it's the Command 5.5 updated 12 months ago.
 
I have in the past been a user of both Garmin & TomTom - both are totally overwhelmed by Waze or Google Maps.

I must confess to much preferring Waze probably as it users real time data collected from users to come up with the best route, and warn you of obstructions.

Google Maps use pre-programmed routes and while Google Maps may flag obstacles or traffic hazards, it will still send you on the same route even if those hazards might slow you down. If you want to avoid these hazards you have to decide on an alternate route
Not in my experience. Google Maps is proactive in diverting if finds a quicker route due to traffic etc. It will suggest it and give you about 60 seconds to reject it before automatically diverting.

I've always found the routes suggested by Google to be a better than Waze. Final straw for me was waze not being able to identify the M5 was closed...

Prefer Waze for crowd sourced alerts (although the morons that can't tell the difference between HATO and a police car do dilute it somewhat)
 
Bendo - Thank-you - interesting.

I wonder why our experiences vary?

NJSS
 
No roads to worry about there..:rolleyes:
True enough. But then us drivers are unlikely to run aground or fall out of the sky ;)

On a broader note, most inbuilt car sat-nav systems use either Garmin or TomTom's underlying technology for routing, traffic avoidance, etc. and for the most part there's not much to choose between their core technology offerings. What muddies the waters is that many car manufacturers restrict access to some of the more bespoke route management options that either manufacturer is capable of in order to simplify the end-user's choices. Whether those "simplifications" are helpful or not is another matter.

Where Google Maps and Waze score is the currency of their cartography, which is something that neither Garmin nor TomTom can compete with as they use a periodic update model. The downside of Google Maps and Waze is that they always have to download their cartography on the fly which is fine until you don't have a data connection - yes, I know you can download a local copy of sections of their cartography, but most people don't do that, and it undermines the "currency" advantage as well as limiting routing functionality.

FWIW, I've been using various Garmin navigators on motorcycles for a good 15 years and while they can have their glitches, they are supremely flexible in their routing and work very well, so I disagree that all things Garmin are bad, even where we do have roads ;)
 
True enough. But then us drivers are unlikely to run aground or fall out of the sky ;)

On a broader note, most inbuilt car sat-nav systems use either Garmin or TomTom's underlying technology for routing, traffic avoidance, etc. and for the most part there's not much to choose between their core technology offerings. What muddies the waters is that many car manufacturers restrict access to some of the more bespoke route management options that either manufacturer is capable of in order to simplify the end-user's choices. Whether those "simplifications" are helpful or not is another matter.

Where Google Maps and Waze score is the currency of their cartography, which is something that neither Garmin nor TomTom can compete with as they use a periodic update model. The downside of Google Maps and Waze is that they always have to download their cartography on the fly which is fine until you don't have a data connection - yes, I know you can download a local copy of sections of their cartography, but most people don't do that, and it undermines the "currency" advantage as well as limiting routing functionality.

FWIW, I've been using various Garmin navigators on motorcycles for a good 15 years and while they can have their glitches, they are supremely flexible in their routing and work very well, so I disagree that all things Garmin are bad, even where we do have roads ;)
OK, maybe I should have said all things Garmin ,that MB have had their hands on, are gash.
 
OK, maybe I should have said all things Garmin ,that MB have had their hands on, are gash.
The OP’s S205 is P+, which will have Burmester Audio and COMAND Online with Tom-Tom based Sat-Nav rather than the Garmin based systems in the Audio 20 systems.

As to the route selection logic, ours will not take the quickest route to our daughter’s house. We think it’s because there is a low bridge warning, a narrow bridge and a tricky junction on the route. That said, one of the routes it offers is along miles of single track country lanes.

When we first got it, a selected route between two places in Cornwall, included a few miles of off-road track rather than using the A-roads…

It’s a quirky system alright.

As far as I know, there is no quick fix to have Car Play and make use of Waze or Google maps. Comandonline do offer an upgrade package though:


Having a smartphone mounted somewhere is always an option I guess.
 
The OP’s S205 is P+, which will have Burmester Audio and COMAND Online with Tom-Tom based Sat-Nav rather than the Garmin based systems in the Audio 20 systems.

As to the route selection logic, ours will not take the quickest route to our daughter’s house. We think it’s because there is a low bridge warning, a narrow bridge and a tricky junction on the route. That said, one of the routes it offers is along miles of single track country lanes.

When we first got it, a selected route between two places in Cornwall, included a few miles of off-road track rather than using the A-roads…

It’s a quirky system alright.

As far as I know, there is no quick fix to have Car Play and make use of Waze or Google maps. Comandonline do offer an upgrade package though:


Having a smartphone mounted somewhere is always an option I guess.
It is amazing that something standard on a Honda Civic 1.6d EX is an extra on a high end Mercedes. But I suppose that illuminated exterior door handles are far more useful.
 
It is amazing that something standard on a Honda Civic 1.6d EX is an extra on a high end Mercedes. But I suppose that illuminated exterior door handles are far more useful.
I agree, it wouldn’t be so bad if all of the illuminated exterior door handles actually illuminated…

Edit - just to add that my son-in-law’s ‘18 plate S205 has CarPlay as standard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHS
I agree, it wouldn’t be so bad if all of the illuminated exterior door handles actually illuminated…

Edit - just to add that my son-in-law’s ‘18 plate S205 has CarPlay as standard.

That would be the facelift model with NTG5.5, and CarPlay was an option - seems like the first owner paid for it - but I don't think it was a standard feature with any trim level.
 
That would be the facelift model with NTG5.5, and CarPlay was an option - seems like the first owner paid for it - but I don't think it was a standard feature with any trim level.
He is the first owner. He may have paid extra for it, I’ll have to ask him. It was a car that was ’in stock’, so I don’t know what options were included.
 
He is the first owner. He may have paid extra for it, I’ll have to ask him. It was a car that was ’in stock’, so I don’t know what options were included.

We had members here commenting that they just bought the car (second hand) and "can't believe that a car costing that much doesn't have CarPlay, my run-of-mill Ford/Vauxhall had it" etc. Fair point... but the fact is that it's an option on MB cars.
 
We had members here commenting that they just bought the car (second hand) and "can't believe that a car costing that much doesn't have CarPlay, my run-of-mill Ford/Vauxhall had it" etc. Fair point... but the fact is that it's an option on MB cars.
The car has the digital dashboard, maybe it was part of that package?
 
The car has the digital dashboard, maybe it was part of that package?

The digital dash was part of the Premium and Premium Plus packages, but AFAIK Apple CarPlay / Android Auto was an additional option. Probably quite a popular one though as it was just an 'activation' so likely not that expensive. Our 2019 S205 Sport Premium does have it (the car was an MB demonstrator originally).
 
I agree, it wouldn’t be so bad if all of the illuminated exterior door handles actually illuminated…

Edit - just to add that my son-in-law’s ‘18 plate S205 has CarPlay as standard.
One of mine still does so I struggle to find the other 3 in the dark.
Was it standard or an optional extra?

Edit. Note to self, read the whole thread before posting!
 
Upgrade to Waze

The issue is that unless you have Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, then using Waze on your mobile phone has become quite difficult with the new rules:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The issue is that unless you have Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, then using Waze on your mobile phone has become quite difficult with the new rules:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Ahh its that copper that doesnt know what hes talking about. Worrying that the standard of traffic cops these days.

As before, the legislation for mobile phones still only applies to a handheld mobile phone. A mounted phone ceases to be a handheld mobile phone.
 
Ahh its that copper that doesnt know what hes talking about. Worrying that the standard of traffic cops these days.

As before, the legislation for mobile phones still only applies to a handheld mobile phone. A mounted phone ceases to be a handheld mobile phone.
Not saying he's wrong, but it would be interested to hear how he explains the difference between touching your phone in its cradle and swiping through 6 screens on the 'glued on iPad' that your car manufacturer has thoughtfully provided to adjust the climate control.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom