gIzzE
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Messages
- 5,735
- Location
- Norfolk, UK
- Car
- BMW F11 Touring + Porsche 911 Carrera S + Toyota Alphard Camper
You are so sure you are right that you just don't read what others write. I do not choose on snob value and in fact have been trying the 5 series recently including several test drives. But in the end I have chosen to buy the E class. (see another thread)
My response was based on your , ugly, common and chav comments.
You really sound like someone who would really buy one.
Hmm, in your opinion, which is great and why we have a choice.I think the E looks much nicer. I do care what a car looks like. It offers a much better ride.
We actually agree on something.It has more space.
According to a survey filled out by consumers who can be bothered to fill it out. I would like to see MB and BMW records to see which is more reliable.It is more reliable according to major surveys (not just one person's opinion).
Again the percentage of problem cars will be so small it doesn't really matter.
Boring??you? f course not!It is safer -I do care about my safety and that of my family. Sorry if you find that boring.
And if you found time to check you would know that Mercedes are not slow but offer performance up to almost any level you could wish or afford. Try an AMG E class. Your ignorance of the marque is astonishing for one who chooses to come to an MB enthusiasts website.
I know the Merc range well, last 6 cars I have had in my company are 1999 C200 estate, 2000 C220cdi estate, 2002 E270 cdi, 2003 S320 cdi and ML270 cdi and then a 2005 S320cdi, until last year. Won't say what the S was replaced with, don't dare!!
What I meant about power and consumption is there is nothing yet in the range that competes with the 335i, 335d, 535d etc. etc. that doesn't cost serious money or drink lots of fuel.
As for poor consumption, one of the biggest complaints by BMW owners according to JD Power is that they do not get anywhere near the mileage per gallon that the maker claims. Go to the What Car website and you can read for yourself.
But then who does??
My C220cdi estate returned 36mpg over 2 years and 86k miles.
My 320d that replaced it returned only 34mpg over 12 months and 41k miles.
In comparison my current 320d touring auto is returning 48mpg (which is a hell of a lot better than the 2005 one that was only seeing 34mpg). Right now the efficient dynamics of the BMWs do appeal.
Problem with customers is that in general they are funkin' idiots, the amount of people that come on a forum and say.. "the offical figures say I can get 50mpg from my E320 cdi extra urban and I am only seeing 36mpg" is amazing.
Have they actually looked at how the extra urban figure is calculated?? Of course those figures are not achievable in our traffic light filled, roundabout scattered, over congested stop start roads of the UK.
If you will let facts interfere with your PR for BMW.
The fact of the matter is, the OP asked...
"Looking at New c 220cdi estate,530d estate(auto),A4 3.otdi auto Quattro avant.......
.....Anyone know more?What would your choice be?"
To which I gave a bit of my experience as someone who does 40k miles a year in these cars, having owned both the E61 5 series and an A4 quattro avant. Nothing more than that.
Last edited: