Swiss Toni
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
- Messages
- 1,593
- Car
- Pedestrian
Really? Ive been a copper over 6 years now and only known of it being used once.
Its very rarely (I didnt say never) used as the punishment for the original offence and the owner/registered keepers naivety is normaly enough.
Also on the point about the seizing. If someone else is present who does have insurance to drive the vehicle then they are supposed to be given the opportunity to drive it onward. If not the vehicle (this is policy, not power) should have been removed. Yes its down to the copper but questions are normaly asked if a no-insurance ticket is written and the vehicle not seized.
It may well be that it is an offence picked up by your force accident processing unit, collision investigation, administration of justice dept or whatever they call the folks who deal with such offences?
Look at the list of offences dealt with at your local Magistrates Court and chances are you will see this appearing on a fairly regular basis.
I agree that if there is someone present who is insured who can drive the vehicle away, they should be given the opportunity to do so - as that is exactly what they would be able to do from the recovery agents yard / pound.
It may be that your traffic dept are the folks dealing with this offence most commonly? (they deal with the aftermath, so perhaps feel the incentive to fully investigate such circumstances?)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"