sgregory124
MB Enthusiast
I think a budget tyre could be classed as any brand that isn't Michelin, Goodyear, Pirelli, Bridgestone, Yokohama or Continental. They would be my top tier 'Premium' brands, followed by the mid-range like Kuhmo, Uniroyal, Falcon et al in the tier below. Finally, your budget tyres like Nankang, would be below that.I know my experience in this instance hasn't been a good one. But wow!!!
Everybody seems extra negative about this brand without actually trying them out..... And the word Budget is used a lot, what does that actually mean?? what basis does a tyre become a "budget" tyre?
If the tyre costs similar to what people deem as "premium" brand tyre.. is it still a budget tyre? And what makes a premium brand tyre a premium? price alone??
After all people could class Mercedes as a "premium" brand yet mercedes have resorted to using Renault engines in some vehicles.. Premium brand with a budget engine?? is that right???
My definition of a 'Premium' tyre is a tyre from a manufacturer who has experience on the racetrack as well as the road, as all the first set of manufacturers I listed above have. Their research and subsequent knowledge of the materials, construction etc is invaluable and in my opinion and more than warrants them charging more for their products.
I don't know what you paid for the Nankang's, but if it was more than £100 per tyre, they most definitely aren't in the same bracket as a premium brand. To give you an idea, I replaced all 4 of the tyres on my C63S last year with Michelin Pilot Sport 4S's and I paid £793. Yes, I have a different car to you so the spec of the tyres is different but, the 4S is widely regarded as one of the best performing tyres for my car so I was happy to pay that kind of money.
If i'd have put Nankang's on there I suspect the car would have destroyed them in < 5000 miles based on their poorer construction and their unsuitability for anything other than 'normal' cars.