Good morning Saorbust,
I always enjoy reading your replies and to a certain degree I agree about your 'apples and pears' analogue, but do you seriously believe that an ML500 is going to be used as an off roader??
When I listed the prices I used the standard specification and the ML500 is way more expensive. The E-class saloon starts off at £45,250, going up to £46720 for the Sport. The ML has just the one price for both the SE and Sport both are £49155. Even the name 'Sport' illustrates that perhaps the M might be better suited to our highways, rather than the 'bye-ways'.
I am not impressed with the quality of street\road information on the NAVTEQ system and as you know I eventually got them to update the Devon and Cornwall Mercedes-Benz Dealership locations which was years out of date. They state how they have cars permanantly out on our roads updating their database, but the M6 toll road never existed for some considerable time (is it there?) Are you saying the TELEATLAS system is better? If this is the case then surely it is worth a short delay to get the superior information? I accept it should not be necessary, but that is a seperate issue.
Regarding the full debate though I don't accept that the M-class should have an inferior COMAND when compared to the E-class. If the E-class can play video, they the 'M' should, can the 'M' play Mp3's?
I am interested in what is available in Japan but it is not really relevant to this debate (although I respect the author of this threads opinion)
Regards,
John