Hello No2fast, I'm William from France. First, happy to see that you want to upgrade the turbocharger after the intercooler upgrade. I read your post about it and it was interesting.
I own a W211 E280 CDI V6 with manual gearbox and can't find any clutch to run with only 600nm of torque of the stage 1. The sachs performance clutch mounted isn't strong enouth. And not certain about my 716.6 gearbox capabilities. At the moment, I am searching solution to a good clutch for om642 with 716.6 gearbox but it is really difficult. When I will find it, I want to upgrade the turbocharger too.
I saw this turbo on ebay and wondering how many relative boost pressure it produce. Do you have some information about it?
About the spool, I think the company tell the truth, I remember a video on a modification turbo company and they said that they used lighter turbine axis and wheel that original and it spool faster even though it's bigger.
Is it really so difficult and costly to do the modifications for a ball bearing turbocharger? A member in mbworld did it in 2014 on a jeep CRD with om642.
Link:
OM 642 + GTB 2260 VKLR and
w211 e320 turbo upgrade - MBWorld.org Forums
A ballbearing turbocharger lowers the exhaust back pressure that lower fuel consumption.
Maybe the member
SaundersW203 could give you some information about a GT2365, he wrote many post about the Om642 on his W203.
Link:
OM642 gt2056v hybrid gt2365v | Performance Lounge
About the gearbox, Mercedes gives 700nm of torque for the 7 speed 722.9. On the 320cdi V6 the gearbox is 722.90
2 W7 C700. (700 because 700nm of torque). But on the 420cdi V8, the gearbox is 722.90
3 W7 C700 (700nm too). I don’t know what is the difference between, but bkorven on youtube put 1000nm of torque at 2300 rpm on his 722.9 and after more than 200,000 km it seems to still work properly.
Link:
Suty455, can you give us more information about the 722.9 gearbox max torque?
One other thing, the first generation of om642 don't like too much pressure and the piston head can crack. The limit I read on few forums seems to be 750nm but no information about the pressure. The pistons heads of the OM642LS are different and they have a lower compression ratio (to decrease the Nox pollution). The compression ratio of the first generation of OM642 is 17.7:1 and the one of OM642LS is 15.5:1. New pistons can manage more boost pressure.
Another interesting post of om642 preparation:
E320 V6 cdi Tuning (T-Rex) - MBWorld.org Forums
Informations on Om642 big modifications are rare. If you do some turbo upgrade on your CLK, please write it because it’s important information for Om642 community.
About DPUK, they mainly work on Om606 and they don't wanted to look at an adaptation of their monomass flywheel for Om606 to replace my Om642 bimass flywheel. Maybe you will be luckier than me, but I have the impression that they don't really want to work on Om642.