• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

SL65 AMG Test Drive

mercboiuk

MB Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
1,782
Location
Norwich, Norfolk
Car
1995 E320 Coupe
I recently drove an '07 plate SL65 AMG, and I figured some of you may like to hear an opinion of my experience (but then again even more of you may just prefer to look at the photos :o).

It was a Sunday morning a couple of weeks ago. The salesman at Robinsons Norwich was very accomodating, even meeting me an hour before the dealership opened, so we could go out while the roads were quiet.
This chap's attitude and manner was VERY different to my previous experience of sales staff at that dealership - Well done to them! :thumb:

Anyway, on to the test drive. The guy had planned a route to encompass a mixture of roads - town, dual carriageway and twisty country roads. It took around 45 minutes to complete the route.

The Asthetics:
As soon as I climbed aboard, I was overwhelmed by the quality of the cabin - very much an improved picture on those late-90s/early '00's cars, when this car was obviously conceived.
Being an '07 car, it had the facelift sat-nav system and paddle shift (rather than button shift) on the steering wheel.
The interior was coated with lashings of Anthracite coloured leather. There was also Carbon Fibre optioned for the centre console and door inserts, which looked fantastic.
As for the exterior, the silver paint complimented the interior very well, as did the gun-metal coloured "65 AMG" wheels. Again, it being the '07 facelift, there was the smoked tail-lights and rear brake light, along with the 3-slat grille, with a black coloured backing. Also, note the Performance Pack front bumper now has "veins" on the side air vents (they were just empty vents, pre-facelift).

The Drive:
Starting the car, the exhaust gives off a gorgeous burbble.
The entire drive was with the roof down. Squeezing the throttle in Park, the lovely V12 burbble grows. However, the noise seems to disappear once your in Drive and on the move. That's such a shame, as I can only imagine how it would sound with a mor-suiting exhaust :(

In town, it's amazing how quickly the car shinks around you. I remember jumping into an R230 when it was first released and thinking how huge it was. However, in practice, I found it extremely easy to thread the car through what little traffic there was. The gearbox in town was very good, the ride superb.

Heading out on the dual carriageway section of the route, I knew this would the Merc's party trick.
The '65 motor has well over twice the torque of my Audi's engine, so I was expecting it to be grin inducing. I wasn't quite expecting the onslaught of power, though.
Down the slip road, we were WELL into licence-losing territory.
We drove down to roundabout, going all the way round and coming back on ourselves. Exiting the roundabout, I was travelling at around 30mph. Squeezing on the power to round half throttle, the traction control actually had to intervene becuase the power! Again, we were travelling very fast, in such a small amount of time. This could get addictive! :devil:

Before reaching the twisty section, I put the suspension and gearbox into their sportiest settings, and flipped over to the paddles. These are very intuitive, and work well with the gearbox. Even under full throttle, I detected very little retardation from the torque converter - surprising, considering the torque figure of this engine!
Fortunately, I knew this section of the route fairly well, therefore knowing when I could "press on".
This is where the Merc really showed it's weakness.
There was so much weight out front that I never really felt confident. On a couple of corners, I could feel the nose running wider than expected.
I was pleasently surprised at the lack of scuttle-shake in the cabin, and there was only a hint of chassis-flex round the bends - the AMG engineers obviously know what they are doing! Unfortunately, you cannot engineer around physics, and the sheer weight of the thing really means this car cannot handle like other sports/convertibles out there.

The Verdict:
By no means is this car bad. It's an astonishing peice of engineering.
The car is beautifully constructed, and looks gorgeous! As a point-and-squirt, grand tourer, it's an epic car - there's nothing much out there that can match this car's mid-range grunt.
You just have to be a little careful in the corners. ;)

Finally, the Photos:
IMG_3944.jpg

IMG_3946.jpg

IMG_3947.jpg

IMG_3948.jpg

IMG_3945.jpg

IMG_3949.jpg

IMG_3953.jpg

IMG_3950.jpg

IMG_3951.jpg


Darren
 
Last edited:
They do say this about the 65's vs the 63's and 55's. The extra mass of the 4 additonal cylinders really does make its presence felt. I suppose its the mass of a normal cars engine put over the front end over ontop of the mass of a large engine.

I'd try an SL63 and see how you feel. It has the wetclutch gbox as opposed to a TC and you may find that even more intuative.
 
My dads SL500 makes a great noise (with SL55 Exhausts). I've had a SL55 blast past me on a A road and the sound is amazing.

I have heared that the V12's don't have 'that' noise.

Also the first time I saw a SL65 I had to google it as I thought what is that, at the time wasn't it about £30K more than a SL55 ?
 
My dads SL500 makes a great noise (with SL55 Exhausts). I've had a SL55 blast past me on a A road and the sound is amazing.

I have heared that the V12's don't have 'that' noise.

Also the first time I saw a SL65 I had to google it as I thought what is that, at the time wasn't it about £30K more than a SL55 ?

I've never hear an SL55 on full chat, I'm afraid to say, although I have heard one pull away from a roundabout gently. Yes, I certainly did sound better from outside than the 65 from inside.

As for price, I think you're right. About £30-40k. This particular car was for sale at Robinsons when new, prices just shy of £150k. With 10,000 miles on the clock it's lost well over half it's value :eek: OUCH!

Darren
 
Very good write up - thanks!

Interesting to note your comments about the handling - I wonder if the '63 is a lot better?
 
Nice to see it's the gen of 65s I still love, even after nearly 6 yrs.
 
I saw the car there last week...very nice! Thanks for the write up.
The sales staff must have changed, as although all my cars have been serviced there for the last six years, I haven't bought one from them since 2004:o They did not seem to want to sell at a competetive price!
I tried an SL last year, but decided that for the amount of times I would have the hood down, the fact that it was nothing like as refined as the S Class with the roof up steered me in a different direction.;)
 
Darren,

It looks spotless fresh, are you serious. Still about £75-80k and it will drop another 50% of that in 3 years. A new 500 would be a better bet, or as I said a lightly used 63.

I really can see the attraction though, love a V12 but the handling woes put me off. I'd save the cash and get a 600 :D

Steve
 
Darren,

It looks spotless fresh, are you serious. Still about £75-80k and it will drop another 50% of that in 3 years. A new 500 would be a better bet, or as I said a lightly used 63.

I really can see the attraction though, love a V12 but the handling woes put me off. I'd save the cash and get a 600 :D

Steve

Hi Steve,

In all honesty, I've had a hankering to drive one of these since they first came out. I saw my opportunity, so took it.
However, I don't think I would buy that particular car, purely because of your well-made point :)
For similar money, you could get an older AM DB9 Volante, an Audi R8 V8, an older Lambo Gallardo Coupe or Ferrari 360 Spider (or maybe even an older F430 Coupe).

It looks spotless fresh, because it is (pretty much). It didn't appear to have any stone chips or stratches. One of the wheels looked to have a local repair to it, but the colour didn't quite match and the wind deflector was missing for some reason :confused:

Darren
 
Out of that list the R8 would get my nod or the Lambo :D

I have to say, if I could test one of those for an hour I would not see it as time wasted ;)
 
Slightly O/T, for ***

I have to say, if I could test one of those for an hour I would not see it as time wasted ;)

I certainly didn't think it was time wasted when I had an R8 (manual transmission) for a day last year.
A truely remarkable piece of kit!
The V8 sounds even better than in the RS4, and it's handling is sublime - Got to love the Lotus Road in Norfolk :devil:
I drove it around 120 miles, and in that time I realised I have to own one at some point in my life! If you have an opportunity to drive one, Steve, then I highly recommend you take it! :D

Here are a few photos: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=142824&id=508355978&l=9d4a49eac9

Darren
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom