• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Uninsured driver clampdown

Thmsshaun

MB Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Messages
2,630
Location
Ontario, Canada
Car
2009 C300 4Matic, 2012 Kia Sportage, 2015 Triumph Tiger800 XCX
I am sure someone had posted about this :confused:

However an interesting article.

Blanket camera coverage: thin end of the wedge?

The Government's Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system goes live from today, and Transport Secretary Alistair Darling has promised tough enforcement action to crack down on uninsured drivers. Police forces across the country are now able to use ANPR cameras to spot, and ultimately seize and destroy, cars being driven without insurance.

The cameras are linked to a database which contains details of all vehicles registered in the UK which are believed to be uninsured. The Transport Secretary saw West Midlands police in action as they began the crackdown.

Alistair Darling said: "Today we are sending out a very clear message to those who drive without insurance- there is now no place to hide. The new powers to link up cameras and the insurance database will make it far easier for police to tell if passing cars are uninsured and take action against the driver.

"On top of these powers we are creating a new offence of keeping a vehicle without insurance. This will be enforced through a new database of insurance details which means that uninsured drivers don't even need to be on the road to be caught. It is estimated that every law-abiding motorist pays an extra £30 a year because of uninsured drivers. Drivers are rightly fed up with those who flout the law and we are determined to rid the roads of this small hard core of anti-social drivers."

The new offence of keeping a vehicle without insurance, announced by the Government in September, will mean that uninsured drivers can be caught before they even take to the road. Earlier this year the government gave the police new powers, to seize and ultimately dispose of any vehicle being found driven uninsured.

Road safety group Safe Speed however said that ANPR won't fix the problem. ANPR is a system that uses a video camera looking at vehicles to 'capture' number plates. The registration mark is then compared electronically with various databases of vehicles that the police may be interested in.

Safe Speed said that Government's claims that ANPR can be effective against uninsured drivers do not bear scrutiny:
It's not the vehicle that needs insurance under the law, it's the driver.
About three million motor vehicles are 'in the trade' at any one time. Most of them will be properly insured, but none of them will be listed as insured in the databases.
At least 1.5 million vehicles are in large fleets and are not insured based on vehicle registration mark. They aren't in the databases either.
It's far from unusual to have a vehicle that is registered as insured being driven by a driver who has no insurance to drive in force. ANPR thinks the insurance is OK, but it isn't.
Even with a massive police effort it is virtually inconceivable that they will reach 250,000 prosecutions in a year. With two million uninsured drivers that means that the average uninsured driver should expect to get caught just once every eight years.
ANPR can be defeated by stealing or cloning vehicle registration marks. Widespread use of ANPR will make this practice commonplace and threatens to undermine the entire registration process. Reports suggest that 10 per cent of vehicles are already lost to the system.
Police officers have already reported so many false positives with ANPR, that they simply turn the equipment off -- as reported in Auto Express.
Vehicle seizures will encourage the use of 'disposable' vehicles. The Police crush a £100 banger, and the uninsured driver simply buys another. He's back on the road in a week.

Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign said: "Estimates of the number of uninsured drivers on our roads range up to 2 million. By any standards it's a serious problem. But serious problems require serious solutions. Current plans are a bad joke.

"The uninsured driver problem is considerably worsened by this government's anti-car and anti-motorist policies; more and more motorists are finding that they are simply better off outside the law."

PistonHeads says: it's an honourable start for the system with laudable aims -- but it's also another step towards a camera-infested, totally surveilled society. Is this what we really want?
 
Good thing too. My dad got rear ended by an uninsured driver a few years back. What happend? Nothing. He got off scott free and my dad had to shell out for a new car!
 
I dont see where cameras will help, they dont know who a driver is so how can they tell if a driver has insurance or not, someone might be insured on that car other than the actual driver who might not have any insurance at all!

Am i missing something here?
 
The proposals dont go anywhere near far enough.
If a car is recognised as not having insurance it should be impounded immediately and the driver given 7 days to prove he is insured.
Failing to do this should result in instant crushing of the vehicle and the bill for doing so sent to the driver.
Failure to pay this should result in a jail term.

As long as people can buy unroadworthy cars for £60 at auction and drive them away without any documentation the problem will persist unless extreme measures are used to stamp it out.
 
Rumble said:
I dont see where cameras will help, they dont know who a driver is so how can they tell if a driver has insurance or not, someone might be insured on that car other than the actual driver who might not have any insurance at all!

Am i missing something here?

It basically works on road fund licencing. To get your road tax you need to show a valid insurance certificate which has more than one month of the new tax disc validity period remaining. Without this you cant get the tax. Without the tax they assume the car isnt insured.

However, what is to stop certain people from simply not renewing their insurance after they get the tax disc or cancelling the policy once they have the disc. As far as ANPR is concerned the vehicle is taxed so therefore must be insured. Not always true.

What it will do (read should do) is provide the police with a means to more quickly spot stolen vehicles which are undoubtedly driven without insurance.
 
Alfie said:
It basically works on road fund licencing. To get your road tax you need to show a valid insurance certificate which has more than one month of the new tax disc validity period remaining. Without this you cant get the tax. Without the tax they assume the car isnt insured.


I have taxed a car with about a weeks insurance left :confused:
 
Alfie said:
It basically works on road fund licencing. To get your road tax you need to show a valid insurance certificate which has more than one month of the new tax disc validity period remaining. Without this you cant get the tax. Without the tax they assume the car isnt insured.

I know that particular safeguard is there but what im saying is the government should be in collusion with insurers to check daily/weekly the tax database against the insurer's database that way they'd combat insurance cancellations. Rather than putting a face to a car? I mean I could be insured to drive any car beit i only have third party if i drive someone elses car, how will a camera know this, their system would only know it if they could recognise who I was, is the technology that good?
 
I remember in manchester a few years back.

Me and teh fmaily were off to have some food and we were watching this clown in a ford ka blasting music out in his standard setup and suddenly breaking going into the back of a brand new mercedes.

the guy in the MB gets out and the other guy drives off!!!!! He was stood in the middle of the road in amazement!

Safe to say the car was probably not his and he was probably not insured (and yes it was in rusholme).
 
mobeyone said:
Safe to say the car was probably not his and he was probably not insured (and yes it was in rusholme).

Surprise surprise, there are some right t*ts around there. Saw a very similar thing a couple of years ago:

Young chav with his chavette wife and baby chav (who was about 6 months old and in mummy chavs lap, none of them were wearing seatbelts either) doing the traffic light grand prix down wilmslow road went straight in to the back of another car, probably cos his brakes were pants. When the other guy got out to inspect the damage the chav sped off down a side street. :mad:

And yes, this was in Rusholme too. You should have seen it this weekend just gone, it's embarassing to be honest :(
 
I try to stay clear of the place now - excellent food, shame about the fools that rally up and down that stretch of road.

Just dont get it.
 
Insurance £1000/year+, fine £100-£200, chance of getting caught - slim.
Too tempting for some. :mad:
 
mobeyone said:
I try to stay clear of the place now - excellent food, shame about the fools that rally up and down that stretch of road.

Just dont get it.

Foods not that good anymore, if you want REALLY good indian food head up to Leeds/Bradford and go to a place called Akbars. Top notch :D
 
Some fools skidded into the back of my car about a year ago and then drove off - I suspect they were uninsured/unlicenced/unMOT'd/untaxed/drunk etc but I imagine their main reason for driving off was to avoid buying a new back end for my car, insurance or not! :mad:
Mambo said:
Foods not that good anymore, if you want REALLY good indian food head up to Leeds/Bradford and go to a place called Akbars. Top notch :D
If you want cheap Indian food try Karim's Orient Experience, about 2 minutes from the M60 in Middleton :)
 
Shude said:
Some fools skidded into the back of my car about a year ago and then drove off - I suspect they were uninsured/unlicenced/unMOT'd/untaxed/drunk etc but I imagine their main reason for driving off was to avoid buying a new back end for my car, insurance or not! :mad:

If you want cheap Indian food try Karim's Orient Experience, about 2 minutes from the M60 in Middleton :)

Karims is good, I used to go there until I discovered Akbars :D
 
Mambo said:
Karims is good, I used to go there until I discovered Akbars :D
Karims is great! My tip for anyone who wants to go is to pace yourself, don't over-fill your plate, don't bother with too many starters and leave plenty of room for dessert! Also don't eat for a day or two beforehand ;)

The best thing about Karim's is the doorman with the Arabian outfit including huge hat, sword and shoes with curly toes :)
 
Shude said:
Karims is great! My tip for anyone who wants to go is to pace yourself, don't over-fill your plate, don't bother with too many starters and leave plenty of room for dessert! Also don't eat for a day or two beforehand ;)

You sound like a man with buffet experience. I always overload on the starters! :crazy:

Shude said:
The best thing about Karim's is the doorman with the Arabian outfit including huge hat, sword and shoes with curly toes :)

:D

All this talk of food is making me peckish.....
 
and me!!!

Was at nawaabs on saturday - not bad tehre either and yep, i overload on starters aswell!

Guess where I am going for some food tonight aswell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
mobeyone said:
and me!!!

Was at nawaabs on saturday - not bad tehre either and yep, i overload on starters aswell!

Guess where I am going for some food tonight aswell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mmm nawaabs :rolleyes:

Maybe we should start a new thread on fave Indian Restaurants?

Yes, I am missing the Word Association thread
 
Last edited:
1)I have trade insurance, and not all of my vehicles are 'listed' at all times with the ins company.

2) I can tax a car that isnt mine... with 2 days of insurance showing on the certificate

3) there was a typo on the system - K9 JBM became K9 SBM or somthing - and my mate got stopped on occasion 1 - the plod tried to arrest them as the car came up as an ambulance (they were insistant) - and occasion 2 they insisted it was not insured (which i suppose was right-ish, but not my fault).

My insurance states "any vehicle in my posession OR own" - so in theory i could drive a stolen car, but be insured ;)

oh - and had a laugh at the number plate reg systems - i saw a police car in a petrol station - the system tried to make sense of the 'reg plate' on the bonnet - it came up with PO15 ICE ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom