Phil1968
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2015
- Messages
- 591
- Car
- C219 CLS 500, W447 Vito 119 CDI
Took the Vito in for a service today & the only courtesy vehicle they had available was a 2013 Smart car. After the initial comedy factor had evaporated I thought it would be interesting to make the comparison with my other half's IQ, Toyota's take on the micro city car. I started my 100 mile round journey & initial impressions were that the auto gear selector was far from intuitive, the selection not being the usual "P-R-N-D", it's a convoluted lever route to engage forward & reverse, there is no Park. I soon gave up using the semi-auto mode as it's slow witted & opted to leave it in "auto" as progress seemed a lot smoother. It feels like an automated manual as the drive take up feels like a mechanical clutch, not the usual torque converter & the throttle dips automatically between the upward changes. The throttle blip on the downchanges sound good though. The engine even sounds good when wound on, dare I say not unlike a Porsche 911 (3 cylinder engines do sound like 6 cylinder engines at certain RPMs). Quite nippy too with more than adequate acceleration. However, a motorway car they are not. They'll cruise comfortably at the national speed limit but they don't feel at all stable & any kind of cross-wind just exacerbates that. And of course you get the usual small car syndrome of everyone driving a hair's breadth off your chuff. The interior felt quite cheap & plasticky too. So in conclusion, a fine city car (that's what they were designed for of course) but just don't take it out of the city. The engine was smoother, felt nippier & sounded nicer than my other half's IQ (they both have 1 litre 3-pots) but Toyota did it much better with the IQ in terms of quality & packaging. And, unlike the Smart, the IQ is perfectly fine on the motorway.
Last edited: