I'm a bit annoyed as I drove a 150 mile round trip to look at a 2000 W Reg SLK230 at an independent dealers. It was described as 44,000 miles with FSH and was priced at £11,000
I'm no mechanic but it looked OK to me. The paintwork was fine with no chips or dents and the only thing that I could fault (apart from it being dirty inside with dog hairs everywhere) was a broken switch to open the roof.
The problem arose when I asked to see the service records as what was described in Autotrader as FSH turned out to be one stamp in 2001 at 10,000 miles and another in 2002 at 20,000 miles with nothing since at all. It has had two owners so on the surface it looks like the second owner never bothered to get it serviced - unless I am overlooking something.
According to Parkers this model should be retailing at £12,500 at an independent dealer with 60,000 miles on the clock so on the surface this one seems to be underpriced by £1,500 plus.
Bearing in mind that I am no mechanic do you think it's worth the risk ?
I'm no mechanic but it looked OK to me. The paintwork was fine with no chips or dents and the only thing that I could fault (apart from it being dirty inside with dog hairs everywhere) was a broken switch to open the roof.
The problem arose when I asked to see the service records as what was described in Autotrader as FSH turned out to be one stamp in 2001 at 10,000 miles and another in 2002 at 20,000 miles with nothing since at all. It has had two owners so on the surface it looks like the second owner never bothered to get it serviced - unless I am overlooking something.
According to Parkers this model should be retailing at £12,500 at an independent dealer with 60,000 miles on the clock so on the surface this one seems to be underpriced by £1,500 plus.
Bearing in mind that I am no mechanic do you think it's worth the risk ?