• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Best performing aftermarket CLS55 AMG discs?

7om

Active Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2015
Messages
115
Location
Cornwall, UK
Car
CLS55
Hello,

Having had my car for a few weeks, I've noticed that the front discs are slightly warped.

The CLS is heavy car so has anyone tried different disc and pad setups for fade resistance and longevity? I've searched the forum and can't find any A/B comparisons.

I used to use stop tech and brembo but if anyone has any tried and tested experience with the CLS AMG I'd be keen to hear your experience.

Thanks,

Tom
 
Did you get yours changed Sean ?
 
Where do I get the performance pack discs? I read the link but it's confusing, are they MB discs or aftermarket? Do I need to reset something?
 
You need the larger calipers not just the discs.
 
Does anyone know of a performance and tuning Merc forum I can visit please for write ups etc.
 
Are your discs really warped? It's relatively uncommon, more usually glassing or pad material deposits.

If you are only using your car on the road there will be no better pads and discs than from MB.

The best compromise between performance and durability. MB did an awful lot of R&D on their offering.
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I'm convinced that they are warped as under braking even from 70mph the car judders with each wheel rotation. As the car slows, so does the judder. I'll go for MB discs and pads all around, hopefully not too expensive.

Are the Pagid offerings at Euro Car parts not worth a shot?
 
Pagid are OEM for the standard car so you won't be missing much by fitting them.
 
Pagid may be OEM but their aftermarket pads are likely to be different from the original quality.

Not saying they're poor quality, just not OEM. Personally I would stick with MB, their prices are very competitive and you know what you're getting plus a 2yr warranty.
 
Bit of a contradiction there, may be OEM but not OEM? Whilst production tolerances may not be as high for non MB branded items from OEM suppliers there's very little if any difference in my experience of fitting either. In some cases the product is identical bar the box...
 
No contradiction, OEM means original equipment manufacturer. It doesdnt mean their aftermarket offerings are the same as their MB parts offering.

It also doesn't carry the same assurances and warranties as MB

Your money, your choice...
 
Please don't fit pagid pads, they are horrible and squeal no matter what (speaking from experience). Stick to OEM.
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I'm convinced that they are warped as under braking even from 70mph the car judders with each wheel rotation. As the car slows, so does the judder. I'll go for MB discs and pads all around, hopefully not too expensive.

Are the Pagid offerings at Euro Car parts not worth a shot?

The discs aren't warped. As said the judder will most likely be caused by uneven pad deposits or uneven disc wear. Either of these result in DTV; disc thickness variation

"Warped" suggests physically distorted like a buckled bicycle wheel.
Grey cast iron has a lot going for it as a material for brake discs but it isn't a material that's known for it's ductility i.e. try and physically bend/distort it and it virtually always cracks

Excessive axial (side to side) run out has a pretty similar effect to physically warped, the disc wobbles from side to side as it spins. As with a buckled bicycle wheel this alone doesn't cause a brake judder because when applied the brake pads will simply follow the disc as it wobbles i.e. as one pad is moved back into the caliper the other is free to move out until it contacts the disc

Excessive disc runout (due to dirt or rust on the hub face etc) does mean that the pads are gonna contact the disc in a couple of spots every time the disc rotates even when the brakes aren't applied. If the run out is bad enough then over time this can result in a miniscule variation in disc thickness due to uneven wear i.e. the disc is fractionally thinner in a couple of spots. This WILL cause a noticable judder, it's akin to riding a bike down a flight of stairs instead of along a smooth road

Uneven pad deposits cause the same result but for kinda opposite reasons... instead of there being several low spots on the disc there are high spots due to uneven transfer of friction material to the disc. Uneven friction deposits can sometimes be 'fixed' simply by using the brakes hard a good few times but it depends some on the pad compound as brakes work with both abrasive friction and adherent friction. More abrasive (dusty) pads are probably better in this regard?
There's also a metallurgical cause of DTV which we don't need to go into but basically it also results in uneven wear and (along with pad deposits) is the reason why manufacturers advise not keeping your foot on the brake when stationary after hard use of the brakes. Especially when bedding in new pads and/or discs

This crude sketch shows the difference between "warped" / axial run out (on the left) and DTV on the right. The white lines represent a disc with zero run out and thickness variation, the red is a gross exaggeration of run out and DTV

dtv.JPG

In reality we're talking about tiny fractions of 1mm, a generic spec for max runout of a newly installed disc is typically 0.8mm while a decent quality disc will usually have a claimed thickness variation of less than 0.01mm! A thickness variation of 0.05mm can result in a judder felt through the pedal according to many sources for example http://europe.delphi-dso.com/downloads/private/techical%20bulletins/Brakes%20Tech%20Bulls/32%20-%20BRAKE%20JUDDER.pdf
Note that a single dial indicator, while useful for checking disc run out when fitting new discs, cannot differentiate between run out and DTV which may be part of the reason why the myth of "warped" discs refuses to die?
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom