Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and why do they always ask for your postcode when you dial the emergencies to report a crime?
Hopefully you and I are friends and we will never fall out. The written word does not travel very well but I am only tryong to answer your questions in a half hearted impartial manner. I dislike traffic police with a vengeanceas i can see you are getting a bit hot under the collar, i shall make a gracefull exit from this post for now until all tempers are chilled
I cannot see how my post is patronising, you posted a link where a police officer has been disciplined internally for something?? An internal police discpline inquiry, not a criminal court of law. No one knows what he did, the newspaper convienantly gloss over that very relevant issue but if it were a criminal offence then he would have been arrested and charged. You then say "You can find quite a few like that" but like what? What is this person guilty of and how many is quite a few?
The police service is an extremely large organisation and like any large organisation there will be a few rotten apples, but that is it... a few rotten apples. We all know about a doctor that killed old age pensioners so can we find "quite a few like that"? Or vicars that sexually assault young children. It is wrong, totally wrong to generalise and tar everyone of the same profession. Trust me when I say that I have more reason than anyone to hate traffic officers, but I would never generalise and make inflammatory claims about all traffic personnel. I had the misfortune to come up against a rotten orchard and that is it. When the going gets rough our police tend to run to-wards the danger whilst other folks tend to run in the opposite direction.
If there is a 'bent' copper that has been convicted in a criminal court then they deserve all they get and by all means name and shame them. They have betrayed the trust of the public they swear to serve. Gareth Powell being an ideal example but he was one person that brought disgrace onto a very brave section of our society who I will defend today, tomorrow and next week. It appears you enjoy behaving the way you do, but please don't object when others may disagree.
If what Dent Guy claims to have happened did happen then I feel for him and it must have been at the very least 'frustrating'. I wasn't there and have only heard one side of this confrontation and having heard one side I can only offer a one sided opinion. He was wronged.
Regards
John
Edit
Recycled the rtatio of traffic officers to beat officers is miniscule. I will try to get the Devon & Cornwall figures
Freddy-Fred, are you getting grumpy again?
can anyone explain to me if the priority is stopping dangerous /careless driving or fining those who do it?
Very funny because i went to my PTA meeting where the headmaster informed us that he was lobbying the police to empower him to fine and clamp parents cars who park on zigzags and as soon as he gets that power, we will never have to make any more fund raising activities in the school.
I now asked him if his priority was stopping people from parking on the lines or was it clamping and collecting revenue. he did not answer but i told him he might make thousands for the year and end up with 5 dead kids. what will he prefer?
obviously he will not say that in public will he? just like some other organisations we know off.
simply put a man with a high vis jacket on the street and a cap with a notebook is what he should be lobbying for not sneaking up on people and clamping cars.
Moreover those that are new to the street and do not know about the clamps will still park there so you may have your money and then some dead people for good measure.
I take note of Grav's very serious warning and would respectfully point out that I consider Recycle a friend and someone I have talked to via pm's. If he asks a question then I will put myself out to answer it in a factual and precise manner. The written word is never the best means of communication but hopefully I have never criticised him for his believes. I have attempted to have a laugh about his attitude, but nothing else.Yes it's a difficult and dangerous job, and will only ever get more dangerous as police will without doubt end up armed, but statistics of officers injured or killed in the line of duty have nothing to do with the alleged use of a mobile phone while driving -
John your posts are getting more and like ....well I don't know but I though I'd add it for effect.
I don't like mobile phones, I like mobile phones used in cars even less.
I also don't like the fact that in this case a police officer was reading someone the riot act based upon supposition only - if he had seen the guy with the phone in his hand the by all means prosecute - but what is all this waffle? did he see him or not? if he is prepared to swear on oath that he did then this is surely enough? The phone proves little after the offense if the damned date/time isn't set right, or in the case of my Ipaq which forgets what it is if not charged .
Just make sure you set your phone clock a few hours out.
more like if the books needed balancing yes.
if the cash count for the month was acceptable, then no.
and john if ten coppers in a van say someone did something and a member of the public said otherwise, i would believe the member of the public.
10 coppers equals 1. they will always back each other up as they are one big gang who have to work with each other against the public.
My experience (personal not hearsay)
6 coppers beating an individual in a van then claimed he assaulted them in court.
1 5ft 4 man v 3 6ft coppers and 3 fat coppers.
the judge threw the case out faster than it came in.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.