I like the peace of mind the warranty appears to offer, and it's true that I've had one quite expensive repair (£1500) to replace two front airmatic front struts. If I'd had the warranty, this would have saved me quite a lot.
Or would it? ...in order to get the full warranty that pays out 100%, warranty direct first need to go over your car with a fine-toothed comb before accepting your application. Obviously they don't want to insure against a heap, as that's expensive for them.
Therefore, on slightly older cars like mine that are more likely to have failing parts due to age, in order to get the warranty accepted in the first place, the car needs to be in fairly good condition. If they had seen my soon-to-fail cracked airmatic struts, they would probably have rejected my warranty application.
So, the warranty is not quite the bargain it seems at first. Perhaps the best way to look at the warranty is that it just provides peace of mind in the eventuality that something expensive breaks.
Maybe some, including myself view the warranty as a way to reduce maintenance costs...just let the warranty pay out on stuff that needs replacing, excepting consumables like brakes etc?
Any thoughts on this anyone?
It might be worth seeing if MB would be willing to offer me a warranty, but due to the age of the car they may not be interested.