why the baiting of a fellow mb enthusiast?
oh, it's the old boys clique..
It’s not a matter of ‘baiting’: The OP talks of wanting a “quick and luxurious” car and yet is proposing to make a modification which will detract from both those qualities of the baseline vehicle: the comfort and dynamics.
I just don’t ‘get’ the point of some of the changes (but then it's not my car or my money) for example these wheels: what is the point of fitting bigger wheels, which will in all dynamic cases on UK roads actually degrade the performance of the vehicle, if there isn’t a necessity i.e. the need to accommodate commensurately bigger brakes.
Compared to standard sized wheels they will detract from comfort, not so much in France or Germany (where many of the example pictures used so far are taken), where the roads are better than those in the UK.
If the OP is proceeding in full knowledge of those issues then so be it, or perhaps there’s a point that I’ve missed, in which case I’m entirely happy to be educated.
OK, so what other benefit? Regarding dynamics they’ll make the steering feel heavier and slower to change direction. (Think gyroscopes and precession.)
In the picture of the Brabus car above the wheels presumably haven’t been fitted for use in high performance applications because the brakes haven’t been upgraded to take advantage of the newly available space in the wheel.
Yes I’m sure we’ve all hammered along the autobahnen at the speed of heat, where occasionally an Eastern Bloc truck causes us to need to scrub speed at an alarming rate, and for which we’re all grateful for a Merc’s stopping power, but it doesn’t happen every couple of hundred yards like it does on the track.
All I’m attempting to do is encourage the OP to think about what he’s trying to achieve, and to understand the trade space which he is occupying with respect to comfort, dynamics, financial cost and cosmetics.