jeremytaylor
MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2005
- Messages
- 2,414
- Location
- Surrey Hills
- Car
- E280CDI Sport Est., CLK 200k Cab., VW T5 174, Citroen C8, and a 2CV!
I have a residents visitors permit to park in the side street at work which is subject to a CPZ in Brent, NW London. All legitimate. I parked on the morning of 5/12/06 and didn't return until 6/12/06 (Christmas party to blame ... hic!). When I returned there was a parking ticket wallet with just the return envelope in it. Strange, I thought, because I knew I had my permit and had parked legally. I recall seeing a Water van parked on the single yellow opposite, working on a repair, but cars could still pass along the road with no problem.
A few days later I saw a resident in the street who I knew, and she asked if I got a parking ticket the other day. I said no, but I did have one empty ticket envelope under my wiper. She than told me how on this other day the wardens had had a field day giving tickets to legally parked resident cars because, apparently ... the bays had been suspended. And yet none of the residents were aware of this and had continued to park ... and got tickets. Apparently the bays had been suspended because of the above-mentioned water works.
And so today in the post I receive two 'Notice To Owner' for the 5/12/06 and 6/12/06. The date of issue of the Notices is 10/1/07.
My defences are:
1. No offence under RTA 1991 as no ticket placed on vehicle or handed to driver. (The empty wallet suggests either the warden was incompetent or a third party removed it, but does this really happen?)
2. Ticket unreasonable as any suspension signs were not clearly visible to me, nor to a number of fellow residents, by all accounts.
The signs indicating the residents parking restrictions (CPZ) are on lamp posts. At the location in question they are @ 60m apart. There is a post in between, but this has no sign fixed to it. Is this relevant?
I am NOT trying to get out of a legitimate ticket. The circumstances above are a factual description of what happened. A car is essential for my job (visiting houses) and I am well used to receiving and paying parking tickets because of inadequate parking arrangements all over London. However, any constructive and/or knowledgable assistance from anyone in the know would be gratefully received (e.g. Robert Saunders!). I don't see why I should pay £160 when, on the surface, the tickets seem illegitimate and/or unfair.
A few days later I saw a resident in the street who I knew, and she asked if I got a parking ticket the other day. I said no, but I did have one empty ticket envelope under my wiper. She than told me how on this other day the wardens had had a field day giving tickets to legally parked resident cars because, apparently ... the bays had been suspended. And yet none of the residents were aware of this and had continued to park ... and got tickets. Apparently the bays had been suspended because of the above-mentioned water works.
And so today in the post I receive two 'Notice To Owner' for the 5/12/06 and 6/12/06. The date of issue of the Notices is 10/1/07.
My defences are:
1. No offence under RTA 1991 as no ticket placed on vehicle or handed to driver. (The empty wallet suggests either the warden was incompetent or a third party removed it, but does this really happen?)
2. Ticket unreasonable as any suspension signs were not clearly visible to me, nor to a number of fellow residents, by all accounts.
The signs indicating the residents parking restrictions (CPZ) are on lamp posts. At the location in question they are @ 60m apart. There is a post in between, but this has no sign fixed to it. Is this relevant?
I am NOT trying to get out of a legitimate ticket. The circumstances above are a factual description of what happened. A car is essential for my job (visiting houses) and I am well used to receiving and paying parking tickets because of inadequate parking arrangements all over London. However, any constructive and/or knowledgable assistance from anyone in the know would be gratefully received (e.g. Robert Saunders!). I don't see why I should pay £160 when, on the surface, the tickets seem illegitimate and/or unfair.