PeterE320Cdi
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2006
- Messages
- 485
- Location
- Devon
- Car
- C219 CLS 320 CDi, R170 SLK 230K, XC60 Past Cars: S210 E320 CDi rusty, CLK 240, S210 E300 DT
Hello Everyone.
I have just heard back today (1st June) from my local dealer about my rust warranty claim. I first took my car in for photos on the 7th April.
When I took my car in I was told that they would not check the suspension mounts as this was not covered by the warranty and if I wanted them checked I would have to pay a labour charge which I declined, do you know if this is standard practice?
The car was then checked over with claims submitted for following:
n/s front door
n/s front wing
n/s rear door
n/s rear wing
o/s front door
o/s front wing
o/s rear door
Tailgate
It turns out that the o/s rear wing had previously been resprayed so was not covered.
The claims have now been approved but I have been asked to pay a 35% contribution towards the wings and the tailgate, the reason given for this is that they have been neglected as I "should" have submitted a claim as soon as the rust was visible instead of waiting till it was bad. The tailgate has a rust bubble about 3cm long. Do you think this seems reasonable, I would think the work involved was the same regardless of when the claim was submitted.
The level of contribution seems very high to me too. I got a quote from a local body shop to repair the rusted areas and the total quote was £700, this included the o/s rear wing.
The level of contribution asked for by Mercedes ranges from £435 to £999 depending on the condition of the panels when they start the work, if they need to replace panels the cost will increase.
Given that the contribution is supposed to be 35% on half the repairs this calculated to a total job cost of about £6000 based on a contribution of £999. Surely this would pay for a whole new body shell??
I have just heard back today (1st June) from my local dealer about my rust warranty claim. I first took my car in for photos on the 7th April.
When I took my car in I was told that they would not check the suspension mounts as this was not covered by the warranty and if I wanted them checked I would have to pay a labour charge which I declined, do you know if this is standard practice?
The car was then checked over with claims submitted for following:
n/s front door
n/s front wing
n/s rear door
n/s rear wing
o/s front door
o/s front wing
o/s rear door
Tailgate
It turns out that the o/s rear wing had previously been resprayed so was not covered.
The claims have now been approved but I have been asked to pay a 35% contribution towards the wings and the tailgate, the reason given for this is that they have been neglected as I "should" have submitted a claim as soon as the rust was visible instead of waiting till it was bad. The tailgate has a rust bubble about 3cm long. Do you think this seems reasonable, I would think the work involved was the same regardless of when the claim was submitted.
The level of contribution seems very high to me too. I got a quote from a local body shop to repair the rusted areas and the total quote was £700, this included the o/s rear wing.
The level of contribution asked for by Mercedes ranges from £435 to £999 depending on the condition of the panels when they start the work, if they need to replace panels the cost will increase.
Given that the contribution is supposed to be 35% on half the repairs this calculated to a total job cost of about £6000 based on a contribution of £999. Surely this would pay for a whole new body shell??