• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

W212, w204, 250 or 350 CDI efficiency?

Some incredible mpg figures. Wow. Best i ever got was an indicated 75 mpg from a VW 1.6 diesel hire car over 750 miles in 2 days. Diesels really are the best for motorway work.
 
and my question was about how much difference there is in reality (i.e. between pre-2010 and post-2010 diesels) or if there was just a change in measurement method and there's none in reality... ?
The later 265bhp drivetrain really is more economical than the earlier one, in part due to engine changes but also due to the switch to the 7g+ gearbox. The difference is reflected in the lower CO2 emissions, and it's not a result of any measurement method change. Another benefit of the adoption of the 7g+ gearbox is that it eliminated the slight lag when pulling away from a stop that was present on the earlier cars.

I ran my 2011 265bhp E350CDI from new for 35,000 miles and kept full fuel consumption records. The average consumption - real, brim-to-brim - was 38mpg. Beware claimed mpg based on the car's trip computer: mine would routinely show around 10% lower consumption (i.e. a higher mpg) than the real brim-to-brim measure. Most of my driving was on fast A- and B-roads on my daily commute, but obviously over that distance it also included motorway and city driving so it's a realistic view of fuel consumption unless you have a high bias towards short city runs in stop/start traffic which in my experience carries a heavy consumption penalty.

If fuel economy is important then the 265bhp BlueEfficiency drivetrain (introduced on cars built from around April 2011) is the sweet spot until the very last cars with the 9g gearbox. Avoid the AdBlue "BlueTec" pre-facelift cars as they drink more diesel and have a lower power output.
 
Some incredible mpg figures. Wow. Best i ever got was an indicated 75 mpg from a VW 1.6 diesel hire car over 750 miles in 2 days. Diesels really are the best for motorway work.

Just an overall champion of smiles per gallon and low down torque.

Here's some 16 min - 1.33 hr non motorway from mine - facelift S204 C250 CDI 7g+ .

Screenshot_20241111_113831_Gallery.jpg


Screenshot_20241111_113947_Gallery.jpg


Screenshot_20241111_114423_Gallery.jpg

It goes into 7th @ 47mph on the flappy.

I'm always changing up early which trains the gearbox to shift earlier .
 
Thanks. I test drove a E250 and tbh I found the dissonance between lovely interior and canal boat noise not impressive so though I won't discount the 250 (because I'm tight and besides if it's in a nice spec I'd get used to it) I'd prefer a 350. 47 OBC sounds like low 40s in reality, which is probably fair enough.
It’s worth listening to few 250s. Mine sounded very canal boat like until I changed the engine and trans mounts. Made a huge difference to the noise. This was at about 80k miles. Mine is near silent from inside when cruising. Certainly can’t hear any engine noise over Road/wind noise.
 
Thanks. I test drove a E250 and tbh I found the dissonance between lovely interior and canal boat noise not impressive so though I won't discount the 250 (because I'm tight and besides if it's in a nice spec I'd get used to it) I'd prefer a 350. 47 OBC sounds like low 40s in reality, which is probably fair enough.
Have you been in the 350 with the newer engine and 7 speed box? You're not that far from me if you wanted a spin.
 
Forget a horrid DIEsel, i have seen 52mpg from my w204 c180 2013 petrol in serene silence and comfort

A friend owns a 2011 204 diesel and the engine noise is nasty!
 
I wouldn’t recommend an EU6 MB anyway, because of the potential pitfalls of the AdBlue system.

If the CAZ/ULEZ charge was a consideration (which, as stated, it isn't) then I would suggest a frugal 1.6L petrol engine (e.g. W204 2012 onwards with the M274). Just in case anyone else reading this find themselves asking the same questions.

Sensible advice. But for me just too slow I'm afraid and I like turbo diesel torque. Although I now live darn sarf and down here doing 72 mph makes you a speed demon I still want to reach said speed in a time measured in heart beats not erosion of rocks :D
 
Have you been in the 350 with the newer engine and 7 speed box? You're not that far from me if you wanted a spin.

Not yet, very kind of you, but I need to update my signature as I now live in the south with all the tesla fast lane lane hogs :oops:
 
Forget a horrid DIEsel, i have seen 52mpg from my w204 c180 2013 petrol in serene silence and comfort

A friend owns a 2011 204 diesel and the engine noise is nasty!

You're right, they are horrid, but they also feel quick compared to non-turbo petrols and they do excellent mpg whch is cash I'm not burning (literally) ;)
 
You're right, they are horrid, but they also feel quick compared to non-turbo petrols and they do excellent mpg whch is cash I'm not burning (literally) ;)
My 2015 c250 although tractor like on tick over was extremely quiet at speeds, it certainly wasn't slow either. 👍
 
I really like the sound of my 231 horse E350 V6.....one of the better sounding dervs IMO.....when its running! As far as economy goes I've not had the chance to drive it long distance yet thanks to a combo of work, her lists of things to be done and blowing a turbo......but the sort of around town use and 10 to 15 mile journeys I've been doing have returned about 32 mpg.....so 40 plus should easily be doable on a longer trips....and with a healthy new turbo!!! Although I like to "use" a car as intended I'm also pretty good at eking out a good mpg if the mood takes me!!!
 
I really like the sound of my 231 horse E350 V6.....one of the better sounding dervs IMO.....when its running! As far as economy goes I've not had the chance to drive it long distance yet thanks to a combo of work, her lists of things to be done and blowing a turbo......but the sort of around town use and 10 to 15 mile journeys I've been doing have returned about 32 mpg.....so 40 plus should easily be doable on a longer trips....and with a healthy new turbo!!! Although I like to "use" a car as intended I'm also pretty good at eking out a good mpg if the mood takes me!!!
I used to see a real (tank to tank) 44mpg on a good run to Norfolk with the cruise set to 75mph (about 72 mph in reality), on my W211 320 CDi sometimes slightly higher.
 
I really like the sound of my 231 horse E350 V6.....one of the better sounding dervs IMO.....when its running! As far as economy goes I've not had the chance to drive it long distance yet thanks to a combo of work, her lists of things to be done and blowing a turbo......but the sort of around town use and 10 to 15 mile journeys I've been doing have returned about 32 mpg.....so 40 plus should easily be doable on a longer trips....and with a healthy new turbo!!! Although I like to "use" a car as intended I'm also pretty good at eking out a good mpg if the mood takes me!!!

What happened to the mega mile 159 ?!

So this is model of engine I'm curious about because the 230 horse one is (on the spec sheet) quite a bit less efficient than the 260 horse one. I.e. £385 road tax and 39 mpg average vs £305 road tax and 44 mpg average for post 2010 cars. Over a year and 25k miles that starts to mount up. I'm not fussy about the power difference but don't want to chuck away money... I just wondered if the difference in mpg on the specs was actually a reality for owners.

I used to see a real (tank to tank) 44mpg on a good run to Norfolk with the cruise set to 75mph (about 72 mph in reality), on my W211 320 CDi sometimes slightly higher.

That's really good especially for the older model as on paper its only 37 mpg (£415 tax too, ouch).

For context my current 1.6 diesel is supposed to average 60 mpg. Driven when it was warmer it did get close to that but now its slipped down to about 53.
 
What happened to the mega mile 159 ?!

So this is model of engine I'm curious about because the 230 horse one is (on the spec sheet) quite a bit less efficient than the 260 horse one. I.e. £385 road tax and 39 mpg average vs £305 road tax and 44 mpg average for post 2010 cars. Over a year and 25k miles that starts to mount up. I'm not fussy about the power difference but don't want to chuck away money... I just wondered if the difference in mpg on the specs was actually a reality for owners.



That's really good especially for the older model as on paper its only 37 mpg (£415 tax too, ouch).

For context my current 1.6 diesel is supposed to average 60 mpg. Driven when it was warmer it did get close to that but now its slipped down to about 53.
I really think people become fixated on the RFL. £405 is not a great deal. It's £1.10 a day.

My day to day mpg on a mix of local rural roads, Salisbury city and some dual carriageway was around 35.5 mpg
 
I really think people become fixated on the RFL. £405 is not a great deal. It's £1.10 a day.

My day to day mpg on a mix of local rural roads, Salisbury city and some dual carriageway was around 35.5 mpg

True. But that 100 quid is a very nice meal out.
 
Hi Phil, not sure where about's you are in Hampshire but you're more than welcome to come and have a good look at my 2012 C350 CDI sport & I'm happy to take you for a test drive etc. I'm based in Ash, close to the Hogs Back area. I have owned it for nearly 8 years/120k miles, it's one of the best all-round cars I've ever owned, love it.

Kind regards Matt
 
I think I have settled on a post 2010 BlueEff C250 or C350 or an E350. I think the tractor ambiance is OK for the C class but a bit too much in the E. And most crucial issue is having leather, heated seats, and no black alloys.
I'll be sure to come back and moan about it soon.
Thank all, very helpful as always.
 
Very much so the case , it had to have real leather and not this man made plastic Artico crap that cracks and splits .
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom