This document from ZF who make the box --taken from a Jaguar forum.
To maybe give a final definitive piece of information on this, I have today, finally received an official reply from ZF GB. Whilst it is no surprise that they advise using the Esso LT71141 oil for the 4.0XK8 5HP24 G'box, I think it is worth reading their reasoning behind it.
Posted here for all to read:
Thank you for your enquiry regarding the correct grade of oil for the ZF 5HP24 automatic transmission as used in the Jaguar application. My reply is based solely on the design and technical requirements of the 5HP24. Cost of the oil is not an influencing factor, as you will appreciate; ZF also has to purchase the oil from Esso.
The design specification of the 5HP24 requires the use of Esso LT 71141 and is filled for life. There is no alternative or equivalent oil, Esso is the only supplier of LT 71141. Under normal operation, the oil is changed after 10 years or 100, 000 mls.
The transmission was not designed to run on Dexron III and if installed you run the risk of premature failure. The transmission is equipped with a sophisticated torque converter lockup control (TCC) system and the correct oil specification is critical to its function and operation. One of the main functions of the oil is to provide the correct coefficient of friction and cooling of the torque converter lockup lining during regulated slip conditions. The longevity of the lockup lining would be adversely affected by the use of Dexron III and in most cases deterioration in shift quality and lockup engagement is also experienced.
I hope these points’ help you make the correct decision to use Esso LT 71141 which will continue protect the longevity of your transmission. The use of alternative oils can only be considered as false economy.
ZF Great Britain Ltd
[email protected]
Autotransmission fluids are a minefield. You certainly want Dexron III as a minimum spec. That said Mercon V which is technically the FORD nomenclature rather than the General Motors " Dextron" nomenclature is reputedly a slightly higher spec ?? The moral seems to be - if you can source the fluid the manufacturer recommends and developed the car with together with a tested service life its best to stick to that. why re-invent the wheel. Factor in the slight difference in cost compared to the cost of repairing a faulty autobox and you have your answer.
p.s. the guy who told you that Castrol Dextron II was OK either knows nothing about autotransmissions or simply doesn't care.