^^ I agree. Most likely to be unintended collateral damage.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlikely.
It just restokes the whole situation - and there is the risk of even greater fallout. And a risk that the perpetrator is fully exposed.
Unintended fallout from the original attack is more likely. Though that raises the question as to who exactly undertook it as you might expect the original perpetrators to make sure they covered their trail with no litter, debris, or other evidence.
I don't think the Russians would want the bad publicity right now either with the world cup.
So my guess - unintended.
Not perhaps if it was in a container/syringe sheltered from water and UV? this interview with the leader of Salisbury Council may shed a bit more light?
So where did he get it? Is there a deeper plot here?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.