Advice needed!

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by speedevilus, Dec 21, 2008.

  1. speedevilus

    speedevilus Active Member

    Messages:
    75
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Hi All,
    After a long break from Mercedes I am coming back again as I used to have a CLK230 and I loved it but then upgraded to Porsche 911, BMW X5 and then Nissan 350Z which I just sold and now got the itch to buy another CLK.

    However, I am hoping you guys and girls can help me:

    My choice is between 270, 320 and 500 which I like the best but not sure of the price of petrol, car tax and running costs outweighs the pleasure of owning a 500 instead of 320 or maybe 270?

    I do an average of 10000 miles per year and I am looking to buy a 2002-2004 model so any advice is appreciated on this.

    Also I have noticed that cars with mileage between 80k to 90k are selling for nearly 2 to 3k less but I know these cars can go well over 200k mileage so does that really matter or is the mileage just a number as long as the car has full service history and good condition?

    I thank you all in advance for your help on this.

    Regards

    Andy
     
  2. OP
    OP
    speedevilus

    speedevilus Active Member

    Messages:
    75
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Anyone???

    Anything anyone? Someone must know loads about CLK on here!:bannana:
     
  3. Howard

    Howard MB Club Veteran

    Messages:
    18,624
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Location:
    Toad Hall
    Car:
    CLS 500 / A 150
    You looking for a 208 shape or 209 ?
     
  4. mr. shr

    mr. shr Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    1,879
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Have you ever driven a Merc V8 ?
    I suggest you try one and then all other concerns you ever had about petrol prices, environment etc. will go straight out of the window.
    Something really speacial about the big engine Mercs that will put many :D :D :D on your face.

    10k per year isn't a lot of miles and the price of petrol is coming down.
    Plus you'll get a nice level of toys in the 5 litre.

    Nothing wrong with the 270 or 320 but the 500 is top of the league by some way I reckon.
     
  5. OP
    OP
    speedevilus

    speedevilus Active Member

    Messages:
    75
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Hi Guys,
    I used to have the w208 230 which I absolutely loved so I want to go for the 209 this time.

    I am so tempted by the 500 and keep thinking sod it I should really go for the 500 then I think lets be sensible and go for middlle ground and buy the 320 damn which way should I go? :confused:

    Thank you both

    Andy
     
  6. The Boss

    The Boss Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    3,524
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    private!
    Car:
    private!
    get the 270cdi/280cdi - best version by far and well worth it
     
  7. The G.F.P

    The G.F.P Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    1,292
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Location:
    Cambridgeshire
    4.3 v8

    or 5.5 v8

    only 2 choices for me
     
  8. gbjeppm

    gbjeppm Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    1,778
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Location:
    Surrey
    Car:
    C207 E Coupe 350cdi, W166 ML 250 Cdi Sport, R171 SLK 350, Suzuki V Strom DL650
    Sorry:D , I agree that the 270 and 280 cdi engine is good, but if you don't do many miles, and lets face it the 10k of the OP is not mega mileage, then the petrols can make a lot of sense, as they are a lot cheaper to buy up front.

    Both the V6 and the V8 plants are superb, and the V8 is something very special.

    Also on the 209 diesel, most that I looked at are a bit poverty spec, as it seems they were destined for the company car driver.:)

    At the end of the day only the OP can decide what is important to him:bannana:
     
  9. OP
    OP
    speedevilus

    speedevilus Active Member

    Messages:
    75
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Thanks Guys,
    What is the MPG on the 500? My Nissan350Z used to do 18mpg which at times was just too much to bear specially when petrol went up to £1.33 at one point so I thought NO I am going to go for the sensible option next time then I find myself here again looking at 500 and 55! I agree that V8 engines are the best options "Bigger the better I always say:D "but are the running costs much more then the lets say 320 or the 270? I am just not a Diesel car person really but they seem to be the prefered option with most people or am I totally wrong on this?

    I don't want to go with my heart on this and buy what I REALLY like then think oh **** why did I do that and didn't just buy a sensible car instead! :(

    I am guessing you can sense the confusion ha? At least I am talking to people who fully understand my dilemma.
     
  10. CE230

    CE230 Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    574
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Location:
    Wylde Green
    Car:
    230CE
    Could it be that 6 months after buying say the 320 you might be wishing you'd bought the 500. I would go for the one that pulls all the strings.
     
  11. vibesg

    vibesg Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    342
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Location:
    Kent
    Car:
    CLS 320 Cdi; Volvo XC90 D5; VW Polo tdi
    Go for what you will really enjoy longer time or for as long as you own the car.
    The W209 320 is dearer to maintain than the 270. I bought my 270 mainly for a balance between economy and performance. It matters to me that I can get 45 to 50 mpg in real world driving. It has more than enough torque (400Nm) and thats enough to get you out of trouble and to overtake cleanly with the 5 speed Auto. I wanted the 320 cdi engine in the Coupe but it wasn't availale in the CLK when I bought mine.
    I've no regrets though.
    As to poverty spec there are enough well specced CLK 270s out there as long as you avoid retailers like Car Giant.
    I've never had a 320 or 500 petrol engine so can't give you any feedback.
    Drive them back to back and then decide. Must say the 270 is a good compromise.
     
  12. fuzzer

    fuzzer MB Club Veteran

    Messages:
    7,939
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2002
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Car:
    F25 X3 20d SE
    Given the choice id go for a CLK270 CDI.

    Its so frugal you don't even have to bat an eyelid about using it and its still got a fair bit of pull and above all , looks the exact same as the other two for less cash.

    spec wise ... the following would be on my shopping list.

    Needed:
    Parktronic
    Xenons
    Telephone prewire
    Heated seats

    optional:
    Comand
    Harman Kardon
     
  13. BaldGuy

    BaldGuy Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    4,304
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2002
    Car:
    Porsche Cayenne Turbo + 911
    Andy

    I have taken the silly option and have a 500, You only live once.. The car is lovely one of the best cars I've owned and highly specced. I average 23mpg and on a motorway run 30mpg... if you toe it it'll return middle teens. It sounds awesome and as many have said, the Benz V8's are lovely...
    If i had a sensible head i'd get a diesel but with the price of diesel and petrol now there is not much in it...
    As much as I love the 208 shape I wanted the pillarless look and really like the 209 shape and style...

    Good luck




     
  14. Howard

    Howard MB Club Veteran

    Messages:
    18,624
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Location:
    Toad Hall
    Car:
    CLS 500 / A 150
    If you aren't doing mega miles , get a V8 .

    I return about the same as BaldGuy in mine ( 4.3 V8 ) and the smile factor is there 100% of the time .

    If you don't , you'll regret it ....

    Imagine sitting in your rocking chair in a few decades time , with your travel rug over your knees thinking ' I wish i'd bought that V8 CLK ' ;)

    At least drive one first so you can see what we mean ! There'll be no looking back .
     
  15. teemsta

    teemsta Member

    Messages:
    33
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Location:
    Manchester
    Car:
    1999 CLK 430
    I can also recommend the V8. I test drove a 320 and a 200 Kompressor (W208) and immediately after driving the 430 I knew which one I would opt for. The noise is fantastic (will be even better when I get my new backbox ;)) and the mpg as mentioned above is fine for the average motorist.


    In all honesty, with another few grand in my pocket I would have gone for the E55, although I am in no way dissapointed with the 430.
     
  16. Jerrytommygal1

    Jerrytommygal1 Member

    Messages:
    51
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    What a compelling argument! :D :D :D
     
  17. Adam230K

    Adam230K Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    3,087
    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Car:
    German oil burner
    Without a shred of doubt, V8.
     
  18. Smiley

    Smiley Hardcore MB Enthusiast

    Messages:
    2,047
    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Lets face it the sensible option would be something like a toyota corrolla diesel so you are nowhere near a sensible option anyway so just get the V8. Make sure you drive one first though and compare with the V6.
     
  19. OP
    OP
    speedevilus

    speedevilus Active Member

    Messages:
    75
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Thanks Guys,
    It really does add a very valuable pesrspective for me. I think driving them first sounds very sensible. I feel that out of these choices 270cdi is the real sensible option but that V8 keeps pulling me towards the 500.

    I am on holiday in Canada but will return next week and should get my test driving shoes on! lol

    I wish you all a Great Christmas and once again thank you for taking the time and giving me your real life experiences.

    Andy
     
Tags:

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.