Why do people go on and on about depreciation
Most people that buy cars do not plan to make a profit on them. They buy them to use. Do you expect to get anything back when you buy a shirt from M&S? Do you expect to get anything back when you spend money on that carribean cruise?
Why indeed.
Even property can't be guaranteed to produce a profit - so what are you expecting?
Folk whine on about depreciation like they're being conned or are forced into some contract and not made aware of the small print (see Hestor thread)
For those who want to place their own hard-earned on a brand new motor - live with it!
For the rest of us with some sense, depreciation doesn't exist. It is a continuum of upgrading, renewal and replacement like any other purchase - shirts, camaeras, hi-fi, cookers etc.
When sad cases like me chance upon a car I like and wish to keep, depreciation simply doesn't exist. I've got a £45k car i bought for £12k ten years ago and could now be worth £4k.
So what does that prove?
F*** all I should think!
My first car - a Renault 5 cost all of £800. 36 years later and C£60k down, I've got a Merc worth bugger all.
Am I bovvered?
Serious investors like my B-I-L and sister buy a knock-down Peploe and in less than ten years see a eight-fold appreciation to somewhere around £150k.
Better bet than a secondhand E-Class, eh?
Having ranted on, I recall eons ago studying Parkers, in which I discovered that if you bought a Citroën 2CV @ £700 and a Citroën CX @ £2600, then X years later, you'd get a lot more for the 2CV.
Plus ça change!