Will....yes I fully agree with you on the fact the battery failure would not be unreasonable for a 5 year old car.....but the warranty clock STARTS when YOU make the purchase...albeit a far shorter period of warranty than a new car........the Sale of Goods Act has been the main reason most established car traders steer clear of the "clearance" (bangers) items as the "fit for purpose" issue still applies...it is either fit for purpose or not....they just trade them or shove them through the Auctions...far less hassle...
Of course, but no trader is going to take a 5 year old/72k mile car and revert it to 'as new' condition.
You get some recourse as a private buyer through the sale of goods act, but it's a bit of a grey area, as has been mentioned.
If the engine blew or the gearbox went under normal use, or there was another serious fault with the car then you would reasonably expect the dealer to pick up the tab. Batteries and springs are non-major, wear and tear items - consumables with a finite lifespan - you expect to replace these over the years. You can't expect that every item on a 72k mile car to be 'as new' and last as long as they would on a brand new car. This is one of the reasons why older cars are cheaper - they have less of a lifespan than a new one, and require more maintenance
It's difficult to say exactly when a spring snapped, that's why I asked about the MOT date. It's obviously quite possible that these items wore out over the last 5k miles.
How about if the trader was to offer to repair the car with two more old springs and a used battery? I'm not sure he's obliged to provide brand new ones due to betterment.
Not trying to play devil's advocate - just providing a realistic and impartial viewpoint It doesn't seem as though anything terrible has happened in this case so far.
Will