[Yeah, yeah I know about left foot braking but how many people do that ? Or rather - do it well ?]
P.
Walter Rohrl's got the hang of it! YouTube - Walter Röhrl onboard montage ~1985
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[Yeah, yeah I know about left foot braking but how many people do that ? Or rather - do it well ?]
P.
They do.
With an automatic you've got two pedals and two feet. The brake pedal is big enough to hold a dance on. So wherein lies the problem?
Oh, and PS......
My E350cdi will roll back - more than just a quarter turn of road wheels taking up slack in shafts/gbox etc - if on a slope.
Does it in C definitely, don't know about S because I never use it.
I had assumed this was just a "feature" of the car and was thankful for the brake-hold feature, rather than using the stupid foot-park-brake.
Erm...... if it shouldn't roll back , should I get it looked at ? Not very used to Merc's.
P.
I don't believe there is anything to stop an ordinary automatic rolling back except the inherent forward creep when in drive. I've driven autos for 30 years and I imagine all would succumb to gravity on a steep enough slope whether it be a downward slope whilst in reverse or an upward slope whilst in drive. I've always stopped cars on the brake as I don't imagine two tons of car forcing the transmission to turn "the other way" can be helpful but I've never thought the fact that it could happen might be a fault. Some cars creep more strongly than others (is that torque related?) so some will roll back on a slope more readily than others. I may be totally wrong.
Yes, thats pretty much what I would think too, Toodeep. There is a one-way clutch in auto-boxes I believe, but I don't know how much backlash is involved along the entire drive train. Clearly there will always be some movement possible.
My comment was in reply to several other posts earlier in the thread about whether autobox cars will roll back - or not depending on whose post. I was simply stating my did (like some others on here), and as some seemed sure it should not, then I asked if I had a problem. By the way, I also think this is to do with the Blue Efficiency declutching the torque converter at standstill - presumably then one would have no "creep-power" [for want of a better description] holding the car via the TC.
And thats one of the reasons why I like the brake-hold on the foobrake - which is what the thread is about. It's easy and convenient. Perhaps I should use the foot operated parkbrake when doing a 3-point turn on a hill, but the brake-hold does it easier.
BTW - I must be coming across now as not in favour of Blue -Efficiency... I have made a number of comments I guess relating to the percieved [by me !] downsides to it. But I haven't anything against B-E really - it's just that these points have some relevance to the topics I have posted in. Happy enough with it all before I get labelled as a knocker.
P.
What? They put SBC on W204!2010 C class
I've not experienced that at all. If the engine is running there is no slack from what I can tell.
Any idea if a 97 CLK 320 Sport would have this feature? Or a 1994 SL320?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.