How does anyone KNOW that the police won't do anything about a crime if you report it?
Is it really a waste of time reporting crimes? Or is it just that you probably won't benefit personally if you report a crime?
Is this an inference that the police only act when there's money to be made?
I find it disheartening when people I'd taken to be well balanced and intelligent have such a short-sighted opinion of our police. I'm not talking about the bad apples within the police forces, of which there are far too many, I'm talking about the general opinion of what the police set out to do. This goes beyond the erroneous beliefs so often voiced that speeding and ULEZ cameras are only there to raise funds for the police.
Within these pages we've seen members challenging the validity of crime figures, then almost in the same breath expressing a view that there's no point reporting crimes. How the **** do you think crime statistics are gathered? What's consequently more to the point is how do you think the police prioritise the use of their limited resources? What may be thought of as a petty crime, probably is when considered in isolation, and unable to justify redirecting resources from more pressing matters. But a whole collection of those "petty crimes" within an area becomes a greater concern and worthy of attention. If nobody is reporting them "because the police do nothing", how are the police to know and take appropriate action?
I think we're all becoming so self-absorbed that we're losing sight of the bigger picture. If we can't see an immediate and personal benefit, we think that there's no point. Through various taxes, we all pay a lot for our police - with very few of us seeming to appreciate what they do for us. We don't see what they're doing for us because they're doing a pretty good job of it. We'd be well up sh1t creek if they were rubbish. They'd be even better if we cooperated with them instead of constantly slagging them off.