• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Time-scale to sort out a claim

kusanku

Active Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2003
Messages
604
Location
Swansea
Car
A180cdi Avant Garde
I posted on here in July about an incident I had. Going straight ahead at a roundabout, when driver in left hand lane decides to go right, and drove straight into the side of me. At the time, he appologised twice for driving into me, which I took as an admission of liability, and we all assured each other than there were no injuries. It was all very civilised, with no arguements or raised voices. A car did pull up, and spoke to him rather than me, but drove off, so there were no independent witnesses. I now believe that this driver was offering to be a witness, but he declined her offer, because he had an agenda.

Reported it immediately, although experienced a lot of trouble getting my insurance company (Norwich Union) to get moving and do anything. I then found out that he had was now saying we changed lanes and caused the accident, and he is also trying on a personal injury claim, pretending to have whiplash:mad: . Utter rubbish, as we were doing about 20mph, and the angle at which he hit us would not be consistent with this. Obviously a rather dishonest individual, but I know that lots of people try it on in these situations. My car was fixed (and now sold), and I have a protected no claims bonus, so if he gets away with it, my only real loss will be the £350 excess I had to pay for the repair.

I did get a letter saying the uninsured loss recovery people were on the case. How long would be a reasonable amount of time to wait before chasing this up? I suspect, in the absence of independent witnesses, the insurance companies will go for a 50/50, although if I can get my excess back, it would be nice.
 
Don't hold your breath, with no independent witness you're well and truly stuffed I'm afraid with one drivers word against another. Settlement will be 50/50.

I always carry a disposable camera with me and photograph any incident before any vehicles are moved and that way there is a record of vehicle positions from which it is possible to apportion blameworthiness.
 
There is no time limit as long as the claim is lodged within the specified time....carry on with life and allow your insurers to deal with it...
 
Don't hold your breath, with no independent witness you're well and truly stuffed I'm afraid with one drivers word against another. Settlement will be 50/50.

I always carry a disposable camera with me and photograph any incident before any vehicles are moved and that way there is a record of vehicle positions from which it is possible to apportion blameworthiness.


Me too, but the collision was on a roundabout, blocking traffic, and he pulled forwards to park before I had chance to get the camera out. Took photos afterwards, which I sent in, but obviously none could show the exact position of the vehicles at time of impact, which would have shown that he was at fault, being halfway into my lane.

Probably am stuffed. Annoyed when I found out he was opting to go for the total liar strategy, but less bothered now.
 
Probably am stuffed. Annoyed when I found out he was opting to go for the total liar strategy, but less bothered now.

And thats the problem, ther more lies he tells the more the web becomes spun and the insurers just become reluctant to persue it and give in.

With all the accidents that I have had over the last ten years or so I have always telephoned for the police to attend saying that I had been involved in an accident and that I felt "unwell" no matter that I didnt if you see what I mean;). That wasnt to persue a claim although, once it did help me because I was very much "unwell" but, the plot was to get an independent on site and take statements. Might be seen as wasting police time over a trivial matter (to them or other members of the public) but what the heck, you pay your taxes? and I've never been stuffed so to speak.

Portzy.
 
And thats the problem, ther more lies he tells the more the web becomes spun and the insurers just become reluctant to persue it and give in.

With all the accidents that I have had over the last ten years or so I have always telephoned for the police to attend saying that I had been involved in an accident and that I felt "unwell" no matter that I didnt if you see what I mean;). That wasnt to persue a claim although, once it did help me because I was very much "unwell" but, the plot was to get an independent on site and take statements. Might be seen as wasting police time over a trivial matter (to them or other members of the public) but what the heck, you pay your taxes? and I've never been stuffed so to speak.

Portzy.

In the USA Police will just appear as it out of nowhere -- I think they get involved with all accidents - well in MA they seem to.

I can remember on a journey through RI a car turn across infront of my sister -- this involved a head on smash...she jumped out of her car (other woman that is) and ranted and raved....we were in shock ..within minutes police cars were everywhere and she was quite firmly told to get her Ass back into her car and shut her noise...as her noise was as bad as her driving...we were very pleased to have them in attendance..
 
I thought the police would not get involved unless there was an injury?

I did get them involved in my last claim, where someone drove into the side of my car whilst trying to park next to it in tesco. I pointed out the damage, but the chap denied causing it (in spite of an independent witness), refused to give me his details, and simply drove off. Had no option but to call the police to track him down. When they called on him, he got stroppy with them, and they ended up aresting him.

This is the first accident on the move I've been involved in which was not a rear-end shunt. Even with those, I had two dispute liability:eek: One bloke, who pulled out of a junction and went into the back of me while I was giving way to another car, even had the bottle to say that he was stationary and that I reversed around the corner into him. Similar scenario of trying on whiplash, and enormous charges for hiring a car for two weeks while his was fixed. He even tried to claim £50 for the time it took him to fill out the claim form. Went to court, he lost, and ended up paying for a new back bumper on my car. I suspect my insurance company would not have pursued that so rigorously had he not been trying to claim for loads of extras. As the current guy is clearly trying a similar strategy, they might look into it properly. But maybe not.
 
I thought the police would not get involved unless there was an injury?.

Thats correct. What I used to say over the phone is that "I dont feel very well at all" or, "my arms/legs/chest feel very strange" or, something along those lines, I never lied;).

On each occasion I genuineley felt sick both physically and mentally and the call operators never try to go into specific injury types. The object of the execise though was to get myself a reliable witness or two. I couldnt see any harm and I still dont see any harm in recruiting the police because, as I said, I pay my taxes etc and why should I have to wait until I have a fracture or three before I get a hand up.

I might be coming across as a bad boy but I'm not really:rolleyes:

The only downside is you get to play with a breathaliser on each occasion:)

Portzy.
 
I've only just recently worked out that your avatar was not you.......:o

Ha! Ha! You're not the first to say that. One or two others have thought that I was a girl/woman/mixture but I'm reluctant to change my avatar after so long, its Charlotte Church btw;)

Portzy.
 
I owuld never have thought that was Charlotte Church... she actually looks quite nice in that one:crazy:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom