Clearly having plenty of rust is an important feature to Benz owners, or they wouldn't keep building this in to their cars. On that basis, the w210 is the best Benz, followed by the w202 and then the w124. It's obvious really.
Clearly having plenty of rust is an important feature to Benz owners, or they wouldn't keep building this in to their cars. On that basis, the w210 is the best Benz, followed by the w202 and then the w124. It's obvious really.
I don't see how it's difficult. If you take either a fully loaded C and E or a poverty spec C and E. The E will always be more expensive.
E63> C63. Simples.
I don't see how it's difficult. If you take either a fully loaded C and E or a poverty spec C and E. The E will always be more expensive.
E63> C63. Simples.
Indeed. It's a bit like asking a bunch of chaps what is better- length, girth, technique, endurance- answers will be influenced by one's ownership of assets.
In your original post, you used Ford models and trim levels as an example of good categorisation. Many of the responses are saying that model type is the only criteria, not trim level. AMG versions (ones with AMG engines, that is) are the biggest challenge to this argument. I don't think modern MB trim levels are as standardised as were the Ford ones of old- the names and specs often change, and I think differ from one country to another.
So I repeat my original suggestion- judge by list price of each particular model and variant. Of course, this raises another contentious issue- is a new C200 "better" than a 5y.o. S320 because it costs more to buy?...