Imagine that 100 years ago, the electric vehicle won out and everything was electric.
Move forward 100 years and theres a new fangled technology that offers certain advantages in terms of energy density and possibly refuelling times (electric may have moved on in those 100 years though) but there were some downsides in terms of complexity (too many moving parts), efficiency (lots of wasted energy), and potential explosiveness, both in terms of driving around in a big bomb, and the centralised storage facilities (because you couldn't fill it at home overnight). Not to mention it could leak all over the floor and spread the fire further. Oh, and it would put out a load of weird chemicals into the atmosphere, who's effect is currently unknown and would probably be insignificant.
I can see the same sort of arguments being used. Actually, having just read it back, I suspect it would be a non starter (like my SL)
I guess people don't like change. I know what I like and and I like what I know.
I'm not advocating anything. Just pointing it out. Current electric has downsides as well