...instead of the Micra.
... which had the same mileage but was cheaper (even if it did need some new tyres).
Think that would have been my choice, but so long as the buyer is happy and safe on the road it's a good ending.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...instead of the Micra.
If the noise only started 2 weeks ago, why do you think the dealer is responsible for the repair?
If it was my Grandfather I'd be tempted to negotiate on his behalf and, if it came to it, stump up the cash with or, preferably, without his knowledge.
At his age he really doesn't need the aggro.
Because that's what consumer rights states....and to be fair, if you pay £2330 for a used car, 07 plate, 55,000 miles in good condition from a decent dealer who is confident in his reputation enough to invite buyers into his house (where he sells his cars...his driveway is big enough for around 20 cars!) you wouldn't expect to have to fork out for a repair especially after being driven very sparingly, after around 2 and a half months and after he said he would get it done.
I'm not a mechanic, I can't tell you why the noise only started two weeks ago, but I would say, and also going by the law which may well favour the buyer, it is the dealers responsibility. The same way if you buy a television new or used, and it works for a week and then stops working, you would take it back to the store.
Couldn't agree more.
That doesn't happen very often! (Not publicly anyway).
Because that's what consumer rights states....and to be fair, if you pay £2330 for a used car, 07 plate, 55,000 miles in good condition from a decent dealer who is confident in his reputation enough to invite buyers into his house (where he sells his cars...his driveway is big enough for around 20 cars!) you wouldn't expect to have to fork out for a repair especially after being driven very sparingly, after around 2 and a half months and after he said he would get it done.
I'm not a mechanic, I can't tell you why the noise only started two weeks ago, but I would say, and also going by the law which may well favour the buyer, it is the dealers responsibility. The same way if you buy a television new or used, and it works for a week and then stops working, you would take it back to the store.
I think the trader should give you a full refund and your grandad gets to keep the car, probably a tank full of fuel too for the absolutely despicable way he's been treated.
I mean, expecting to pay for a bush on a nine year old car he's had for three month is just terrible.
Between 30 days and 6 months
If a fault comes to light after 30 days but before 6 months have passed then you are entitled to a repair, replacement or refund. It is assumed in law that the fault was present at the time of purchase unless the seller can prove otherwise. During this period, unless you have agreed otherwise, the seller (dealer) has only one opportunity to repair (or replace) the faulty vehicle after which, if they fail to repair it, you are entitled to a refund.
In the event of a refund following a failed attempt at repair during the first six months the seller is permitted to make a 'reasonable' adjustment to the amount refunded to take account of the use that you have had of the vehicle since you bought it.
Thanks for you're very helpful comments.
Is it normal practice to agree to take care of the MOT once it's due at the point of sale, agree to "look at the car due to the noise, and then inform my aunt who took the car to the dealer that he thinks it's the bush, he will get it repaired with the MOT at his expense", and then ask for a payment before collection. Is it not normal practice for the dealer to diagnose the issue and then inform the owner of the car and ask if he wants to go ahead with the work?
As a buyer, any buyer, should you ignore the law or your rights? I don't make the law.
Thanks for you're very helpful comments.
Is it normal practice to agree to take care of the MOT once it's due at the point of sale, agree to "look at the car due to the noise, and then inform my aunt who took the car to the dealer that he thinks it's the bush, he will get it repaired with the MOT at his expense", and then ask for a payment before collection. Is it not normal practice for the dealer to diagnose the issue and then inform the owner of the car and ask if he wants to go ahead with the work?
As a buyer, any buyer, should you ignore the law or your rights? I don't make the law.
Tut , 2p's worth and low blow.. Give the op a break, he his within his rights as imo the dealer would have had an idea of the bush an mot due date! If it was me I'd straight up refuse paying anything.Happytalk73 said:Tbh you seem to know how you want to deal with this event. You have all the facts and seem to have done enough research. Why would you need to post the details on this forum? Then get sarcastic when you don't get the response you had wished for. Honestly. Just deal with it either way without needing reassurance from members here. As already mentioned, we don't have all the facts. You do. Ant.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.