Flyer
MB Enthusiast
Thanks very much for that explanation. When I was at my dealer last week for an inspection for rust, he said that my car would be repaired as MB goodwill and that MB would withdraw goodwill claims once the vehicle reaches 8 years old. At the time, I just accepted that, believing that actually they had a contractual obligation (as long as I kept to my side of the contract) to repair it for 30 years and I'd argue the point when they eventually turn my claim down.Mr E said:The vast majority of claims recorded here on the site fall into the "goodwill" category. Why? Because there are very few claims that comply with what is covered by the anti-perforation warranty. So what does the OEM do? If they make the repair under "warranty" they have effectively agreed to alter their terms and conditions (within the eyes of the law system, anyway). Exactly as when they place a part when the vehicle is outside of mechanical warranty - it's "goodwill", not warranty. Nothing to do with fudging the books - all the cost hits the bottom line at some point.
My final - and impartial - view is this......MB/DC are going beyond what a number (not all) of OEMs would do. They would be quite within their "legal" rights to not touch the majority of corrosion claims but they do - of course, without making the stupid (in a commercial sense) move of legitimising the situation by declaring an open house on claims or repairing them under warranty. In the situation they are in, I would be advising them to take the course that they are doing. The implementation may be a bit hit-and-miss (and I wouldn't neccesarily try to fix that) and there won't be a bottomless pit to cover it all. I can imagine that "goodwill" repair will get harder to come by as time progresses.
I can now see that my beliefs were wrong