Petrol Pete
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
The Avon ZV5's I have were 7.4mm brand new. the last lot wore down evenly almost to the TWI's before I replaced them , all 4 .I have some sympathy with what Michelin are saying as it's environmentally unfriendly to be disposing of tyres with 4mm of thread left. I've measured some new tyres at only have 7.4mm to start with.
I was though a little surprised to see the claim that Michelins have the same aquaplaning resistance at 1.6mm as a budget tyre at 3mm. That can't be applicable equally to all budget tyres as evacuation of water depends on the tread pattern with longitudinal grooves being better than other patterns. Michelins technology advantage for wet grip must be mostly in the rubber compound and some other tyres may be almost as good for evacuating water at the same tread depth. To keep the whole tyre safety vs tread depth issue in perspective, it's mostly in the wet that the issue exists at all, so just don't push the envelope in the wet. If you lose grip when driving normally you are doing something wrong. Yes there's the emergency situation but good driving should eliminate most of those as well.
Spare a thought for our American cousins who expect to get 100,000 miles out of a set of tyres. They can only be doing that because the tyre manufacturers are using harder compounds than they use in Europe.
It's not as clear cut as a simple figure like 1.6mm
One thing not addressed is tyre age. The rubber gradually get harder and loses grip with age such that even with good tread depth there comes a point at perhaps10 years old when tyres should be changed even though at this point they may still be as good as American tyres.