but they’re competing with home charging at a tenth of the price and car parks which can easily undercut them.
And supermarkets that can offer (mostly slow) charging for free, as a loss leader to get people to visit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but they’re competing with home charging at a tenth of the price and car parks which can easily undercut them.
How long can the companies that built and operate these sites continue with low usage/revenue (many EV owners also comment on how nice and empty sites are)?
In the news this week that Pod Point (mostly owned by EDF) are having problems due to low demand:
True but if trackers were used there would be a big incentive for finding a way to move these from one vehicle to another!
Criminals will always find a way to exploit something.I agree that it's not obvious how the technology can be implemented. ANPR cameras could have the undesirable result of traffic being diverted onto small unmonitored B-roads, and a mandatory GPS tracker (or other type of 'black box') will be open to manipulation by the criminaly-minded.
Would you rather EV fires were not reported at all? Kept a secret for the greater good of the energy transition.
As said, there’s always going to be an element of criminality risk with whichever system is implemented.I'm assuming pay per mile would be set at a level to get reasonable income from lower mileage drivers too (as it would presumably replace road tax as well), so high mileage drivers would likely end up paying more than they do now.
ANPR covering a relatively small number of entry/exit points around a zone is different proposition to reliably covering all movement within a zone, let alone on all roads nationally.
Are current black boxes and phone apps secure and tamper proof enough to replace road tax?
These things aren't insurmountable, just potentially expensive. As would be the system to collect/process/bill ... major government IT projects like this don't have a great track record.
And supermarkets that can offer (mostly slow) charging for free, as a loss leader to get people to visit.
It’s click bait for the hungry, simple as that. And you’ve taken the baitThe prevalence of sensationalist journalism is a given surely when the subject is justifications for/against the energy transition. A notion predicated on there being a climate emergency with mass extinction just around the corner. Doesn't get much more sensationalist that that imo.
Same as Costco/Tesco with their cut price fuel?And supermarkets that can offer (mostly slow) charging for free, as a loss leader to get people to visit.
I'm assuming pay per mile would be set at a level to get reasonable income from lower mileage drivers too (as it would presumably replace road tax as well), so high mileage drivers would likely end up paying more than they do now.
ANPR covering a relatively small number of entry/exit points around a zone is different proposition to reliably covering all movement within a zone, let alone on all roads nationally.
Are current black boxes and phone apps secure and tamper proof enough to replace road tax?
These things aren't insurmountable, just potentially expensive. As would be the system to collect/process/bill ... major government IT projects like this don't have a great track record.
Fires are dramatic events. Those caught on camera are reported, both ICE & EV.If all car fires were reported in the press, then fine. But why report only some fires and not oothers?
People were worried when public transport went cashless - eg Oyster cards. Do you remember when contactless replaced chip and pin (and that replaced ‘signatures’)An app on your phone can be problematic.
What if you forget to switch it off when you board a train... or worse, a plane?
Not true - there’s hundreds of ICE fires every month, and most are never reported.Fires are dramatic events. Those caught on camera are reported ICE & EV.
We know that petrol stations make most of their profit on iimpulse buys, snacks and drinks: we see it every time we go in.
A more interesting question is how many petrol stations will be forced to close in 15 years time when EV's outnumber petrol and diesel - ie. when fuel consumption has MORE than halved, because higher mileage / commercial drivers have long switched to electric?
There are a range of statistics out there but it seems EV Fires are already at least 10 times less likely than ICE fires. However if the cost of those fires in terms of firefighting, collateral damage and repairs was taken into account, then the comparison would at the very least narrow and that is perhaps why insurance costs for EV's are still higher than ICE's. When I was looking to change my car recently I compared insurance quotes for an ICE Golf and and EV Golf. The premium for the EV was typically 40 - 50% higher.
As with most concerns about EV's the issue will be resolved in time as battery technology improves and turns less incendiary.
Maybe cars use less fuel and people are covering fewer miles than they did pre-1990s too?It's pretty common to see people in forecourt shops who aren't buying fuel. As mentioned I certainly see EVs stopped at my local BP (which has no chargers). So it's likely that well-sited forecourts would continue as now as handy convenience stores/cafes, and adding a few ultra rapid chargers would probably guarantee it.
But overall fuel forecourts have been closing steadily for decades - we all know ones that turned into car sales sites/ hand car washes/etc. The Shell station I used in Weybridge was knocked down and turned into flats.
IIRC there are roughly half the number now that there were in the 1990s.
Lol....if you anti EV lot are not moaning about lack of charging facilties and waiting times, it's that they are empty and not utilised enough!How long can the companies that built and operate these sites continue with low usage/revenue (many EV owners also comment on how nice and empty sites are)?
In the news this week that Pod Point (mostly owned by EDF) are having problems due to low demand:
Got to admire your repeated posts positioning reluctance to change as a weakness.People were worried when public transport went cashless - eg Oyster cards. Do you remember when contactless replaced chip and pin (and that replaced ‘signatures’)
And who honestly uses a chequebook anymore?
Anxiety to change is common!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.