I think the issue you have if you do choose to go a legal route is as the law stands (as I understand it) you first have to return the vehicle to the supplying dealer and give them a reasonable opportunity to rectify any issues you raise.
That is my understanding too.
[/QUOTE]If you choose to take the car elsewhere and get it inspected, then present the information to the original supplying dealer for his offer, I guess that's fine.[/QUOTE]
That is the action I am taking.
[/QUOTE]However if you instruct any repairs before these discussions have completed to both parties mutual benefit you're on a sticky wicket.[/QUOTE]
Agreed; I'm not doing that.
[/QUOTE] Legals and charge backs are perfect for non responsive "F off" type traders, but, someone reasonable, who responds and you could well be seen as a malicious litigant.
[/QUOTE]
Not could be; would be, I think. As I already said, "From my point of view, being brutally honest, it would probably be best if he just told me to get stuffed...". He hasn't, and I think won't.
[/QUOTE]He sounds pretty reasonable so far, I'd continue with that and forget about small claims or credit card charge backs, either of those tends to stop any degree of reasonable behavior stone dead.
[/QUOTE]
Of course I will; if you have formed any other opinion, yopu misread my intentions.
[/QUOTE]
Alternative I think you get on to Judge Rinder, I'd like to see how he handles this one
[/QUOTE]
Now there's a thought... Apparently ITV pay the awards if the losing side won't, because Rinder has no legal power to compel any payment to be made.
Edit: Oh S**t! What a mess. I'll get this multi-quote right one day...