It's a shame the debate about EV's has become so polarised. As has been said several times it's entirely the governments fault for appearing to dictate the solution rather than the target for reducing emissions and allowing the automotive industry to innovate. Who knows by the time we get to 2030 EV's may already look like the wrong solution.
The great benefit of an EV to me would be that it doesn't suffer when used for short trips. There are many times I'm reluctant to use an ICE vehicle for a short 3 mile trip because we know short tripping does an ICE no good at all and MPG is very poor. An EV on the other hand has no such limitations that I'm aware of.
An EV is the perfect commuter but the worst choice for a long trip. The fact that an EV can be used for long trips at some inconvenience to the user is by the way and I can't see them ever being the perfect choice for long trips. If EV owners would just accept that they are not perfect for long trips there would be much less argument. One of my regular journeys involves driving to York using the M62 over the hill from Manchester. Has anyone done that trip in an EV as I'd be interested to hear what it does to the battery range. The professional road tests I've read suggest that any claimed battery range would be halved or worse when climbing a hill like that and doesn't recover on the down hill sections.