• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

The EV fact thread

In response to falling demand i would imagine. See Tesla's repeated price cuts over the last 2 years.

Tesla were actually up front about it. Nissan were sneaky buggers, they never actually reduced the price to the retail customer. When I went to the Nissan Dealer they had 3 Leafs in the swanky showroom at the full retail price of 32k with the printouts showing the PCP rates and laughable balloon payment. I had to ask about the supposedly "Ex Demo" cars with zero miles for 16.5k. They were hidden round the back with no prices on.

So I know Nissan are a business but what they did just smacks of bad form to me.
 
Tesla were actually up front about it. Nissan were sneaky buggers, they never actually reduced the price to the retail customer. When I went to the Nissan Dealer they had 3 Leafs in the swanky showroom at the full retail price of 32k with the printouts showing the PCP rates and laughable balloon payment. I had to ask about the supposedly "Ex Demo" cars with zero miles for 16.5k. They were hidden round the back with no prices on.

So I know Nissan are a business but what they did just smacks of bad form to me.
Savvy buyers like yourself get the good deal. Always been the way with car dealers no?
 
Market demand and govt incentives.
Government incentives were certainly a factor in why Sunderland and why the UK. Wasn’t the primary driver to build factories in Europe to mitigate the impact of import tariffs on cars manufactured in Japan, to protect the European car manufacturing industry?
 
@ChipChop


Aye,

30 seconds on Autotrader....... Not a lot of sympathy for people who can't do research.

I just think if Nissan are going to pi££ over their existing customers they should have just dropped the RRP, blamed it on being an "outgoing model" and not slipped it in through the back door.
 
Tesla were actually up front about it. Nissan were sneaky buggers, they never actually reduced the price to the retail customer. When I went to the Nissan Dealer they had 3 Leafs in the swanky showroom at the full retail price of 32k with the printouts showing the PCP rates and laughable balloon payment. I had to ask about the supposedly "Ex Demo" cars with zero miles for 16.5k. They were hidden round the back with no prices on.

So I know Nissan are a business but what they did just smacks of bad form to me.
Umm, "Bad form" in exactly the same way that Ford, Vauxhall, Renault, and SAAB operated over the last 30-40 years?
 
Light Entertainment:

Stumbled across this BMW Films Presents "The Calm" piece from two years ago.

If anyone saw the original BMW Films such as "Star" (directed by Guy Ritchie with Madonna & Clive Owen) a couple of decades ago,

they'll see how much EV's have changed the game, while other things remain the same

(Please don't try this with your Mercedes EQS )

Screenshot 2025-01-08 at 17.45.35.png
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I've been reading more about BEV vs Fuel Cell technology (Hydrogen).

Apparently, with BEV, we generate electricity, run it over long wires to a network of chargers, then store it in the car's battery in chemical form. The battery then releases electricity which is converted mostly to kinetic energy, and some to heat.

With Fuel Cell, we generate electricity, run it over long wires to factories where the electricity is used to produce Hydrogen, we then cool and pressurise the Hydrogen, transport it via road haulage to a network of Hydrogen filling stations, where cars then come and fill up their own Hydrogen tanks. The Hydrogen is then used to generate electricity which, in a similar way to BEV, is converted mostly to kinetic energy and some to heat.

However, it seems that it's difficult to calculate and compare the efficiency betwen these two processes. There are just too many variables to consider. How far do you go? Do you take into account the energy consumption footprint of building and maintaining pylons and chargers? Or of the road haulage and Hydrogen filling stations? E.g., how many more tanker lorries will need to be built in order to transport the Hydrogen, and what is the footprint of their life cycle? The list is long.

Then, there's 'the future' assumptions. Hydrogen may seem 'cleaner' if we produce it only from renewable energy sources. But can we? And BEV seems like a better option is we can develop small, lightweight, high-capacity batteries, that do no require precious metals. But can we?

Etc.

The obvious advantage that both BEV and Fuel Cells have over ICE, is that the cars do not produce harmful emissions, which is important for cars driven in urban settings (which is most of them).

But other than that.... which one is better?
 
The obvious advantage that both BEV and Fuel Cells have over ICE, is that the cars do not produce harmful emissions, which is important for cars driven in urban settings (which is most of them).

But other than that.... which one is better?

When we have compared EV vs ICE we have included maintenance costs as an advantage for the EV due to simplicity. What are the maintenance costs for hydrogen powered car vs an EV?

Fundamentally a fuel cell vehicle is an EV with the added complexity of a fuel cell as I imagine they must have a battery to buffer the output of the fuel cell. Hydrogen is stored at very high pressure in a pressure vessel which will be subject to specialist scrutiny and may need to be replaced at intervals. I don't know about the fuel cell but I would think they are also subject to specialist inspection. Gut feel suggests that the added complexity and specialist nature of the fuel cell vehicle must make it more expensive to maintain than an EV.


Edit:

I remembered something about Hydrogen buses so here's one answer to your question.

Hydrogen buses cost 41% more over their lifetime than battery-electric
 
Last edited:
I hope I don’t get dealt this one. I love driving it in real life. It it’s rubbish in a game of Top Trumps!

View attachment 166175
This one is a bit closer to your cup of tea @Will more relevant to this wonderful forum and a much better Top Trumps card to boot.

1736372167105.jpeg
 
Last edited:
This one is a bit closer to your cup of tea @Will more relevant to this wonderful forum and a much better Top Trumps card to boot.

View attachment 166178
85mph+ all day long towing the caravan in that bad boy in winter and the passengers don’t even need to get out for a coffee on a four hour run such is the immense refuelling speed 😎
 
When we have compared EV vs ICE we have included maintenance costs as an advantage for the EV due to simplicity. What are the maintenance costs for hydrogen powered car vs an EV?

Fundamentally a fuel cell vehicle is an EV with the added complexity of a fuel cell as I imagine they must have a battery to buffer the output of the fuel cell. Hydrogen is stored at very high pressure in a pressure vessel which will be subject to specialist scrutiny and may need to be replaced at intervals. I don't know about the fuel cell but I would think they are also subject to specialist inspection. Gut feel suggests that the added complexity and specialist nature of the fuel cell vehicle must make it more expensive to maintain than an EV.


Edit:

I remembered something about Hydrogen buses so here's one answer to your question.

Hydrogen buses cost 41% more over their lifetime than battery-electric

From what I've seen there aren't any significant extra maintenance costs compared to a modern BEV. The tanks are certified for the life of the vehicle (they are typically carbon, which doesn't corrode of course) and I don't believe there's any 'servicing' to be done on the fuel cell. The higher running costs quoted for fuel cell buses are based on the cost of fuelling, I believe.
 
85mph+ all day long towing the caravan in that bad boy in winter and the passengers don’t even need to get out for a coffee on a four hour run such is the immense refuelling speed 😎

Unlike the nice new BEV buses in Glagow then ;)

THE freezing weather last week disrupted Glasgow's electric buses, causing their batteries to drain faster than usual, and leaving people stranded during their commute.

Some of First Bus’s double-deckers were halted mid-journey due to the freezing temperatures.

A spokesperson for First Bus said that the company is "aware of challenges" concerning the range of its electric vehicles (EVs) in extremely cold temperatures.

 
The tanks are certified for the life of the vehicle (they are typically carbon, which doesn't corrode of course)
Pretty sure they require recertification every three years. How they are tested for that I don't know but having been involved in NDT none of it is easy or cheap.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top Bottom